The Diagnostic Accuracy Between Radiomics Model and Non-radiomics Model for Preoperative of Microvascular Invasion of Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Rationale and Objectives

Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a key prognostic factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The predictive models for solitary HCC could potentially integrate more comprehensive tumor information. Owing to the diverse findings across studies, we aimed to compare radiomic and non-radiomic methods for preoperative MVI detection in solitary HCC.

Materials and Methods

Articles were reviewed from databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library until April 7, 2023. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were calculated using a random-effects model within a 95% confidence interval (CI). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using summary receiver-operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC). Meta-regression and Z-tests identified heterogeneity and compared the predictive accuracy. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare the AUC of two methods according to study type, study design, tumor size, modeling methods, and imaging modality.

Results

The analysis incorporated 26 studies involving 3539 patients with solitary HCC. The radiomics models showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.79 (95%CI: 0.72–0.85) and 0.78 (95%CI: 0.73–0.82), with an AUC at 0.85 (95%CI: 0.82–0.88). Conversely, the non-radiomics models had sensitivity and specificity of 0.74 (95%CI: 0.65–0.81) and 0.88 (95%CI: 0.82–0.92) and an AUC of 0.88 (95%CI: 0.85–0.91). Subgroups with preoperative MRI, larger tumors, and functional imaging had higher accuracy than those using preoperative CT, smaller tumors, and conventional imaging.

Conclusion

Non-radiomic methods outperformed radiomic methods, but high heterogeneity calls across studies for cautious interpretation.