医学
标准化
血压计
腰围
协议(科学)
周长
厘米
急诊医学
医疗急救
血压
内科学
计算机科学
操作系统
外科
病理
替代医学
体质指数
几何学
数学
作者
I.N. Posokhov,Evgeny A. Praskurnichiy,O.S. Orlova,E.А. Sukhodolova,A.V. Lystseva
出处
期刊:Blood Pressure Monitoring
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2024-07-02
标识
DOI:10.1097/mbp.0000000000000715
摘要
Objective A recent International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Task Group report calls for research to investingate potential special populations in validation studies of automated blood pressure (BP) devices. Accordingly, we aimed to determine the accuracy of two previously validated BP monitors passed in a general population when measured in adults with a mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) ≤ 22 cm. Methods Test device A was the OMRON HEM 7121 equipped with the HEM CS24 cuff designed for an arm circumference of 17–22 cm. Test device B was the YuWell YE660Е with the YuWell ‘360°’ cuff (18–36 cm). Data from 37 participants aged 20.14 ± 2.23 (18–28) years were analyzed according to criterion 1 of ISO Standard 81060-2 : 2018. Results According to criterion 1, the mean ± SD of the BP differences for the device A was −7.81 ± 5.20/−10.66 ± 5.48 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) and for the device B was −8.00 ± 6.30/−16.11 ± 5.15 mmHg (systolic/diastolic), respectively. This means that neither device met the requirements. Conclusion Since devices A and B, which had passed in a general population study, failed in adults aged 18–28 years with an MUAC ≤ 22 cm, such individuals might be considered as new special population for validation studies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI