已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Rectal indomethacin is protective against post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients but not average-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 相对风险 安慰剂 置信区间 荟萃分析 内科学 胰腺炎 随机对照试验 临床试验 前瞻性队列研究 风险因素 胃肠病学 外科 病理 替代医学
作者
Sumant Inamdar,Dennis Han,Monica Passi,Divyesh V. Sejpal,Arvind J. Trindade
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:85 (1): 67-75 被引量:58
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.034
摘要

Rectal indomethacin is a popular chemopreventive agent to help prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Previous meta-analyses have shown an overall protective effect for PEP in average-risk and high-risk patients. However, these meta-analyses are limited by a small number of studies. Recently, more trials have been published addressing this issue. The aim is to determine whether rectal indomethacin prevents PEP in average-risk and high-risk groups, after incorporating these new data.A comprehensive search of multiple literature databases in April 2016 was performed. Human prospective randomized controlled trials with placebo controls that examined the effect of rectally administered indomethacin on the incidence of PEP were included.A total of 8 trials between 2007 and 2016 (n = 3778) were included. No significant publication bias existed. All studies used similar criteria to detect pancreatitis. Random effects model meta-analysis showed that the rate of PEP was significantly lower using indomethacin compared with placebo (relative risk, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.65; P < .001) in high-risk patients. There was no significant statistical or clinical heterogeneity. Among average-risk patients, the rate of PEP was similar (non-significant) between the indomethacin and placebo groups (relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.07; P = .115). The result of the main outcome remained robust in multiple sensitivity analyses.Rectal indomethacin given before or after ERCP is protective against PEP in high-risk patients versus placebo; however, it is not protective in average-risk patients versus placebo.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
毛毛完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
在水一方应助曦熙采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
笨笨念文完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
莉莉完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
12秒前
幸福大白发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
无奈的盼望完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
大模型应助咚咚咚采纳,获得10
20秒前
曦熙完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
记得吃蔬菜完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
ding应助hy采纳,获得10
27秒前
28秒前
28秒前
清璃完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
咚咚咚发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
CodeCraft应助医者仓鼠采纳,获得10
35秒前
buno应助wly1111采纳,获得10
39秒前
41秒前
SiO2完成签到 ,获得积分0
42秒前
50秒前
科研通AI5应助chenjun7080采纳,获得10
54秒前
医者仓鼠发布了新的文献求助10
56秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Owen应助jichenzhang2024采纳,获得30
1分钟前
1分钟前
MXene应助木又采纳,获得20
1分钟前
1分钟前
SciGPT应助高挑的如柏采纳,获得10
1分钟前
chenjun7080发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
SDUMoist发布了新的文献求助20
1分钟前
1分钟前
Thien发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助络绎采纳,获得10
1分钟前
李健应助爱航哥多久了采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
小马甲应助roro熊采纳,获得10
1分钟前
CipherSage应助毅诚菌采纳,获得10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
Sociologies et cosmopolitisme méthodologique 400
Why America Can't Retrench (And How it Might) 400
Another look at Archaeopteryx as the oldest bird 390
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4625231
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4024425
关于积分的说明 12457124
捐赠科研通 3709196
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2045920
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1077828
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 960374