亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Rectal indomethacin is protective against post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients but not average-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 相对风险 安慰剂 置信区间 荟萃分析 内科学 胰腺炎 随机对照试验 临床试验 前瞻性队列研究 风险因素 胃肠病学 外科 病理 替代医学
作者
Sumant Inamdar,Dennis Han,Monica Passi,Divyesh V. Sejpal,Arvind J. Trindade
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:85 (1): 67-75 被引量:58
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.034
摘要

Rectal indomethacin is a popular chemopreventive agent to help prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Previous meta-analyses have shown an overall protective effect for PEP in average-risk and high-risk patients. However, these meta-analyses are limited by a small number of studies. Recently, more trials have been published addressing this issue. The aim is to determine whether rectal indomethacin prevents PEP in average-risk and high-risk groups, after incorporating these new data.A comprehensive search of multiple literature databases in April 2016 was performed. Human prospective randomized controlled trials with placebo controls that examined the effect of rectally administered indomethacin on the incidence of PEP were included.A total of 8 trials between 2007 and 2016 (n = 3778) were included. No significant publication bias existed. All studies used similar criteria to detect pancreatitis. Random effects model meta-analysis showed that the rate of PEP was significantly lower using indomethacin compared with placebo (relative risk, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.65; P < .001) in high-risk patients. There was no significant statistical or clinical heterogeneity. Among average-risk patients, the rate of PEP was similar (non-significant) between the indomethacin and placebo groups (relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.07; P = .115). The result of the main outcome remained robust in multiple sensitivity analyses.Rectal indomethacin given before or after ERCP is protective against PEP in high-risk patients versus placebo; however, it is not protective in average-risk patients versus placebo.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
929发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
22秒前
Pony完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
失眠奥特曼完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
称心芷巧完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
酷波er应助称心芷巧采纳,获得50
2分钟前
自己发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
CodeCraft应助自己采纳,获得10
2分钟前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
年轻伯云发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
Xiaojiu完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
CJW完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
嘻嘻完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
k001boyxw完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
4分钟前
4分钟前
阿龙啊完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
hugeyoung完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
marco发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
6分钟前
英姑应助marco采纳,获得10
6分钟前
7分钟前
7分钟前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3965717
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3510950
关于积分的说明 11155657
捐赠科研通 3245410
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1792876
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 874181
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804216