已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Rectal indomethacin is protective against post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients but not average-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 相对风险 安慰剂 置信区间 荟萃分析 内科学 胰腺炎 随机对照试验 临床试验 前瞻性队列研究 风险因素 胃肠病学 外科 病理 替代医学
作者
Sumant Inamdar,Dennis Han,Monica Passi,Divyesh V. Sejpal,Arvind J. Trindade
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier]
卷期号:85 (1): 67-75 被引量:58
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.034
摘要

Rectal indomethacin is a popular chemopreventive agent to help prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Previous meta-analyses have shown an overall protective effect for PEP in average-risk and high-risk patients. However, these meta-analyses are limited by a small number of studies. Recently, more trials have been published addressing this issue. The aim is to determine whether rectal indomethacin prevents PEP in average-risk and high-risk groups, after incorporating these new data.A comprehensive search of multiple literature databases in April 2016 was performed. Human prospective randomized controlled trials with placebo controls that examined the effect of rectally administered indomethacin on the incidence of PEP were included.A total of 8 trials between 2007 and 2016 (n = 3778) were included. No significant publication bias existed. All studies used similar criteria to detect pancreatitis. Random effects model meta-analysis showed that the rate of PEP was significantly lower using indomethacin compared with placebo (relative risk, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.65; P < .001) in high-risk patients. There was no significant statistical or clinical heterogeneity. Among average-risk patients, the rate of PEP was similar (non-significant) between the indomethacin and placebo groups (relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.07; P = .115). The result of the main outcome remained robust in multiple sensitivity analyses.Rectal indomethacin given before or after ERCP is protective against PEP in high-risk patients versus placebo; however, it is not protective in average-risk patients versus placebo.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
4秒前
wbing完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
samsahpiyaz发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
纪星星完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
顾矜应助月Y采纳,获得30
6秒前
uppercrusteve发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
15秒前
15秒前
今后应助北风野很冷采纳,获得10
17秒前
挚智完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
lty发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
JJB发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
26秒前
26秒前
27秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
28秒前
阿峤完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
31秒前
草木完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
33秒前
JTB发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
40秒前
41秒前
lty完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
幸运幸福完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
jessie发布了新的文献求助30
46秒前
uppercrusteve发布了新的文献求助10
46秒前
46秒前
47秒前
YAYA发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
旺仔发布了新的文献求助30
51秒前
rrrrrrry发布了新的文献求助20
51秒前
54秒前
58秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Iron toxicity and hematopoietic cell transplantation: do we understand why iron affects transplant outcome? 2000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1021
上海破产法庭破产实务案例精选(2019-2024) 500
Teacher Wellbeing: Noticing, Nurturing, Sustaining, and Flourishing in Schools 500
EEG in Childhood Epilepsy: Initial Presentation & Long-Term Follow-Up 500
Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5476217
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4577883
关于积分的说明 14363077
捐赠科研通 4505789
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2468870
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1456491
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1430126