亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Rectal indomethacin is protective against post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients but not average-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 相对风险 安慰剂 置信区间 荟萃分析 内科学 胰腺炎 随机对照试验 临床试验 前瞻性队列研究 风险因素 胃肠病学 外科 病理 替代医学
作者
Sumant Inamdar,Dennis Han,Monica Passi,Divyesh V. Sejpal,Arvind J. Trindade
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier]
卷期号:85 (1): 67-75 被引量:58
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.034
摘要

Rectal indomethacin is a popular chemopreventive agent to help prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Previous meta-analyses have shown an overall protective effect for PEP in average-risk and high-risk patients. However, these meta-analyses are limited by a small number of studies. Recently, more trials have been published addressing this issue. The aim is to determine whether rectal indomethacin prevents PEP in average-risk and high-risk groups, after incorporating these new data.A comprehensive search of multiple literature databases in April 2016 was performed. Human prospective randomized controlled trials with placebo controls that examined the effect of rectally administered indomethacin on the incidence of PEP were included.A total of 8 trials between 2007 and 2016 (n = 3778) were included. No significant publication bias existed. All studies used similar criteria to detect pancreatitis. Random effects model meta-analysis showed that the rate of PEP was significantly lower using indomethacin compared with placebo (relative risk, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.65; P < .001) in high-risk patients. There was no significant statistical or clinical heterogeneity. Among average-risk patients, the rate of PEP was similar (non-significant) between the indomethacin and placebo groups (relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.07; P = .115). The result of the main outcome remained robust in multiple sensitivity analyses.Rectal indomethacin given before or after ERCP is protective against PEP in high-risk patients versus placebo; however, it is not protective in average-risk patients versus placebo.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Viiigo完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
guagua发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
科研通AI2S应助guagua采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
热情依白完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
32秒前
33秒前
忧心的香水完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
46秒前
original完成签到,获得积分10
59秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
大气亦巧发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
安青兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
Criminology34举报Raymond求助涉嫌违规
1分钟前
空溟fever发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
hx发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
大气亦巧完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
领导范儿应助谛因采纳,获得50
1分钟前
1分钟前
李健应助赵振辉采纳,获得10
1分钟前
romance发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
斯文败类应助hx采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
level完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
空溟fever完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
caca完成签到,获得积分0
3分钟前
matrixu完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
李爱国应助南威采纳,获得10
3分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Reproduction Third Edition 3000
Comprehensive Methanol Science Production, Applications, and Emerging Technologies 2000
化妆品原料学 1000
Psychology of Self-Regulation 600
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
Red Book: 2024–2027 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5639594
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4749168
关于积分的说明 15006790
捐赠科研通 4797774
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2563840
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1522769
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1482471