已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Rectal indomethacin is protective against post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients but not average-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 相对风险 安慰剂 置信区间 荟萃分析 内科学 胰腺炎 随机对照试验 临床试验 前瞻性队列研究 风险因素 胃肠病学 外科 病理 替代医学
作者
Sumant Inamdar,Dennis Han,Monica Passi,Divyesh V. Sejpal,Arvind J. Trindade
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier]
卷期号:85 (1): 67-75 被引量:58
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.034
摘要

Rectal indomethacin is a popular chemopreventive agent to help prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Previous meta-analyses have shown an overall protective effect for PEP in average-risk and high-risk patients. However, these meta-analyses are limited by a small number of studies. Recently, more trials have been published addressing this issue. The aim is to determine whether rectal indomethacin prevents PEP in average-risk and high-risk groups, after incorporating these new data.A comprehensive search of multiple literature databases in April 2016 was performed. Human prospective randomized controlled trials with placebo controls that examined the effect of rectally administered indomethacin on the incidence of PEP were included.A total of 8 trials between 2007 and 2016 (n = 3778) were included. No significant publication bias existed. All studies used similar criteria to detect pancreatitis. Random effects model meta-analysis showed that the rate of PEP was significantly lower using indomethacin compared with placebo (relative risk, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.65; P < .001) in high-risk patients. There was no significant statistical or clinical heterogeneity. Among average-risk patients, the rate of PEP was similar (non-significant) between the indomethacin and placebo groups (relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.07; P = .115). The result of the main outcome remained robust in multiple sensitivity analyses.Rectal indomethacin given before or after ERCP is protective against PEP in high-risk patients versus placebo; however, it is not protective in average-risk patients versus placebo.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Akim应助研友_闾丘枫采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
leedan发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
4秒前
yuanman发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
6秒前
爆米花应助cgq采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
12秒前
顾矜应助yuanman采纳,获得10
14秒前
着急的猴发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
JamesPei应助菲菲采纳,获得10
14秒前
无极微光应助YeSun采纳,获得50
15秒前
秦百胜完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
AN发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高贵逍遥完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
ding应助tumankol采纳,获得30
21秒前
22秒前
池木发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
好滴捏完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
25秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
28秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
28秒前
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
28秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
28秒前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
28秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
28秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
29秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
29秒前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
29秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
29秒前
29秒前
嘿嘿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
29秒前
29秒前
29秒前
小二郎应助46465采纳,获得10
30秒前
32秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems Third Edition 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
King Tyrant 720
ACOG Practice Bulletin: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome 500
Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5602939
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4688095
关于积分的说明 14852467
捐赠科研通 4686448
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2540318
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1506902
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1471458