记忆的错误归因
心理学
内隐联想测验
概括性
社会心理学
启动(农业)
归属
认知心理学
价(化学)
标准效度
认知
结构效度
心理测量学
发展心理学
神经科学
物理
发芽
生物
心理治疗师
量子力学
植物
作者
Tal Moran,Yoav Bar‐Anan,Brian A. Nosek
摘要
Abstract Co‐occurrence of an object and affective stimuli does not always mean that the object and the stimuli are the same valence (e.g., false accusations that Richard is a crook). Contemporary theory posits that information about the (in)validity of co‐occurrence has stronger influence on deliberate than automatic evaluation. However, available evidence supports that hypothesis only when the (in)validity information is delayed. Further, the existing evidence is open to alternative methodological accounts. In six high‐powered experiments (total N = 1750), we modified previous procedures to minimize alternative explanations and examine whether delayed (in)validity information has a discrepant effect on automatic versus deliberate evaluation. Casting doubt on the generality of the hypothesis, we found more sensitivity of deliberate than automatic evaluation to delayed validity information only when automatic evaluation was measured with the Implicit Association Test and not with the evaluative priming task or the affective misattribution procedure.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI