医学
甲状腺癌
危险系数
不利影响
随机对照试验
相对风险
贾达德量表
内科学
优势比
观察研究
甲状腺
肿瘤科
科克伦图书馆
外科
置信区间
作者
Danielle L. James,Éanna J. Ryan,Matthew G. Davey,Alanna Jane Quinn,David P. Heath,Stephen Garry,Michael R. Boland,Orla Young,Aoife Lowery,Michael J. Kerin
出处
期刊:JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery
[American Medical Association]
日期:2021-06-01
卷期号:147 (6): 544-544
被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2021.0288
摘要
Postoperative radioactive iodine (RAI) remnant ablation for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) facilitates the early detection of recurrence and represents an adjuvant therapy that targets persistent microscopic disease. The optimal activity of RAI in low- and intermediate-risk DTC remains controversial.To evaluate the long-term cure rate of different RAI activities in low- and intermediate-risk DTC. Secondary outcomes included successful remnant ablation, adverse effects, and hospital length of stay.A systematic search of the databases PubMed, Cochrane Collaboration, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared long-term outcomes (>12 months) for American Thyroid Association-classified low- and intermediate-risk DTC based on receipt of either low-activity or high-activity RAI postoperatively.All RCTs or observational studies evaluating patients with low- and intermediate-risk DTC who were treated initially with total/near-total thyroidectomy, followed by remnant RAI ablation with either low or high activities. Eligible studies had to present odds ratio, relative risk (RR), or hazard ratio estimates (with 95% CIs), standard errors, or the number of events necessary to calculate these for the outcome of interest rate.Two investigators reviewed the literature in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Dichotomous variables were pooled as risk ratios and continuous data as weighted-mean differences. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa and Jadad scales.Disease recurrence was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included successful ablation, adverse effects, and length of stay.Ten studies that included 3821 patients met inclusion criteria, including 6 RCTs and 4 observational studies. There was no difference in long-term cure recurrence rates (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.62-1.27, P = .50) or successful remnant ablation (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.87-1.03; P = .20) between low-activity and high-activity RAI.In this systematic review and meta-analysis, low-activity RAI was comparable with high-activity RAI regarding successful ablation and recurrence rates. This suggests that low-activity RAI is preferable to high-activity in low- and intermediate-risk DTC because of its similar efficacy but reduced morbidity.PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020166780.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI