作者
Michele J. Gelfand,Jana L. Raver,Lisa H. Nishii,Lisa Art. Leslie,Janetta Lun,Beng Chong Lim,Lili Duan,Assaf Almaliach,Soon Ang,Jakobina Arnadottir,Zeynep Aycan,Klaus Boehnke,Paweł Boski,Rosa Cabecinhas,Darius K.-S. Chan,Jagdeep S. Chhokar,Alessia D’Amato,María Amparo Blázquez Ferrer,Iris C. Fischlmayr,Ronald Fischer,Márta Fülöp,James Georgas,Emiko S. Kashima,Yoshishima Kashima,Kibum Kim,Alain Lempereur,Patricia Márquez,Rozhan Othman,Bert Overlaet,Penny Panagiotopoulou,Karl Peltzer,Lorena R. Perez-Florizno,Лариса Пономаренко,Anu Realo,Vidar Schei,Manfred Schmitt,Peter B. Smith,Nazar Soomro,Erna Szabo,Nalinee Taveesin,Midori Toyama,Evert Van de Vliert,Naharika Vohra,Colleen Ward,Susumu Yamaguchi
摘要
With data from 33 nations, we illustrate the differences between cultures that are tight (have many strong norms and a low tolerance of deviant behavior) versus loose (have weak social norms and a high tolerance of deviant behavior). Tightness-looseness is part of a complex, loosely integrated multilevel system that comprises distal ecological and historical threats (e.g., high population density, resource scarcity, a history of territorial conflict, and disease and environmental threats), broad versus narrow socialization in societal institutions (e.g., autocracy, media regulations), the strength of everyday recurring situations, and micro-level psychological affordances (e.g., prevention self-guides, high regulatory strength, need for structure). This research advances knowledge that can foster cross-cultural understanding in a world of increasing global interdependence and has implications for modeling cultural change.