答辩人
劳动力
工资
声望
公共关系
专业协会
产品(数学)
专业发展
心理学
营销
教育学
政治学
业务
语言学
几何学
哲学
法学
数学
作者
Gillian Crampton Smith,T. W. Allan Whitfield
标识
DOI:10.2752/146069205789338351
摘要
Increasingly, new occupations emerge that are keen to establish professional status, including those in the field of design. This study examines the familiarity with and perceived professional standing of six design occupations (fashion, furniture, graphic, industrial, interior and product design) by three respondent groups (designers, design educators and the public) within Australia. The study was conducted within the research paradigm of occupational prestige assessment. Regarding familiarity, it was found that the public knew less about these six design occupations than almost all of the other occupations included in the study, with industrial design being the least understood. For perceived level of professionalism, unsurprisingly, the designers and design educators perceived all of the design occupations as generally professional; however, the Public tended to regard them as semi-professional or even skilled workers. To analyse why this might be, design in Australia was evaluated against the generally recognized traits of professionalism. Design was found to lack an adequate career structure, with poor recruitment, training and induction practices. Combined with a low graduate starting salary and a casualized workforce, career prospects for young designers were seen as poorer than for other occupational groups. In addition, the absence of a professional body governing entry into the profession and the maintenance of standards is a serious deficit. Design bodies should be concerned about the public lack of understanding that was evident in this study, particularly if design wishes to advance its professional standing.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI