The Professional Status of Designers: A National Survey of how Designers are Perceived

答辩人 劳动力 工资 声望 公共关系 专业协会 产品(数学) 专业发展 心理学 营销 教育学 政治学 业务 语言学 几何学 哲学 法学 数学
作者
Gillian Crampton Smith,T. W. Allan Whitfield
出处
期刊:Design Journal [Informa]
卷期号:8 (1): 52-60 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.2752/146069205789338351
摘要

Increasingly, new occupations emerge that are keen to establish professional status, including those in the field of design. This study examines the familiarity with and perceived professional standing of six design occupations (fashion, furniture, graphic, industrial, interior and product design) by three respondent groups (designers, design educators and the public) within Australia. The study was conducted within the research paradigm of occupational prestige assessment. Regarding familiarity, it was found that the public knew less about these six design occupations than almost all of the other occupations included in the study, with industrial design being the least understood. For perceived level of professionalism, unsurprisingly, the designers and design educators perceived all of the design occupations as generally professional; however, the Public tended to regard them as semi-professional or even skilled workers. To analyse why this might be, design in Australia was evaluated against the generally recognized traits of professionalism. Design was found to lack an adequate career structure, with poor recruitment, training and induction practices. Combined with a low graduate starting salary and a casualized workforce, career prospects for young designers were seen as poorer than for other occupational groups. In addition, the absence of a professional body governing entry into the profession and the maintenance of standards is a serious deficit. Design bodies should be concerned about the public lack of understanding that was evident in this study, particularly if design wishes to advance its professional standing.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大模型应助ahsky0523采纳,获得10
1秒前
机智的冷珍完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
林翊发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
羊羽完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
怕孤独的凝海完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
周杰完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ttt完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
L1完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
YGYANG发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
fly发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
PGONE完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
冷空气发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
严不平完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
结实初翠发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
天天快乐应助冷空气采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
watercolding完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
傻傻的夜柳完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
大力完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
lemontea发布了新的文献求助20
16秒前
领导范儿应助十一采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
沉静丹寒发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
卫半山完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
可爱的函函应助watercolding采纳,获得10
18秒前
zhouyms完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
xiao.yang完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
HUAMIAO完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
熊二完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
冰汐完成签到,获得积分20
21秒前
suxian完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
共享精神应助Yun yun采纳,获得10
22秒前
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 2000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1200
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6036732
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7756340
关于积分的说明 16215755
捐赠科研通 5182834
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2773661
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1756924
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1641288