Effect of Axial Length Adjustment Methods on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Highly Myopic Eyes

•Specific axial length adjustment methods can maximize the accuracy of the Holladay 1 and SRK/T formula.•Cooke modified axial length method improves the accuracy of Ladas Super formula.•Emmetropia Verifying Optical formula exhibits the best accurate predictions in new generation formulas. PurposeTo evaluate the performance of Holladay 1 and SRK/T formulas with the axial length (AL) adjustment methods including the linear and nonlinear versions of Wang-Koch AL adjustment methods and Cooke-modified AL (CMAL); and to determine whether the CMAL should be extended to the latest Barrett Universal II, Ladas Super formula (LSF), and Emmetropia Verifying Optical formulas in highly myopic eyes.DesignRetrospective, consecutive case-series study.MethodsA total of 164 eyes of 164 patients with AL ≥26.0 mm were included and divided into 2 groups: AL <28.0 mm (Group 1) and AL ≥28.0 mm (Group 2). The average arithmetic spherical equivalent prediction error (PE), mean absolute PE, median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentage of eyes within ±0.25 diopter (D), ±0.50 D, and ±1.0 D of PE were determined.ResultsThe Holladay 1 formulas showed the smallest MedAE when combined with the first linear or nonlinear version of Wang-Koch AL adjustment methods, both in total and in subgroups. The SRK/T formula displayed the highest prediction accuracy in combination with the first linear version of Wang-Koch adjustment method in total and subgroups. The CMAL reduced the absolute PE of LSF in total (P = .003) and in Group 1 (P = .017).ConclusionsThe Holladay 1 and SRK/T formulas combined with specific AL adjustment methods had accuracy similar to the fourth-generation formulas for highly myopic eyes. Moreover, the CMAL can improve the accuracy of the LSF for highly myopic eyes. To evaluate the performance of Holladay 1 and SRK/T formulas with the axial length (AL) adjustment methods including the linear and nonlinear versions of Wang-Koch AL adjustment methods and Cooke-modified AL (CMAL); and to determine whether the CMAL should be extended to the latest Barrett Universal II, Ladas Super formula (LSF), and Emmetropia Verifying Optical formulas in highly myopic eyes. Retrospective, consecutive case-series study. A total of 164 eyes of 164 patients with AL ≥26.0 mm were included and divided into 2 groups: AL <28.0 mm (Group 1) and AL ≥28.0 mm (Group 2). The average arithmetic spherical equivalent prediction error (PE), mean absolute PE, median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentage of eyes within ±0.25 diopter (D), ±0.50 D, and ±1.0 D of PE were determined. The Holladay 1 formulas showed the smallest MedAE when combined with the first linear or nonlinear version of Wang-Koch AL adjustment methods, both in total and in subgroups. The SRK/T formula displayed the highest prediction accuracy in combination with the first linear version of Wang-Koch adjustment method in total and subgroups. The CMAL reduced the absolute PE of LSF in total (P = .003) and in Group 1 (P = .017). The Holladay 1 and SRK/T formulas combined with specific AL adjustment methods had accuracy similar to the fourth-generation formulas for highly myopic eyes. Moreover, the CMAL can improve the accuracy of the LSF for highly myopic eyes.