Effect of Intravenous Acetaminophen vs Placebo Combined With Propofol or Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Delirium Among Older Patients Following Cardiac Surgery

医学 右美托咪定 异丙酚 安慰剂 麻醉 谵妄 对乙酰氨基酚 镇静 随机对照试验 外科 病理 重症监护医学 替代医学
作者
Balachundhar Subramaniam,Puja Shankar,Shahzad Shaefi,Ariel Mueller,Brian O’Gara,Valerie Banner‐Goodspeed,Jackie Gallagher,Doris Vanessa I. Gasangwa,Melissa Patxot,Senthil Packiasabapathy,Pooja Mathur,Matthias Eikermann,Daniel Talmor,Edward R. Marcantonio
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:321 (7): 686-686 被引量:227
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2019.0234
摘要

Postoperative delirium is common following cardiac surgery and may be affected by choice of analgesic and sedative.To evaluate the effect of postoperative intravenous (IV) acetaminophen (paracetamol) vs placebo combined with IV propofol vs dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium among older patients undergoing cardiac surgery.Randomized, placebo-controlled, factorial clinical trial among 120 patients aged 60 years or older undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or combined CABG/valve surgeries at a US center. Enrollment was September 2015 to April 2018, with follow-up ending in April 2019.Patients were randomized to 1 of 4 groups receiving postoperative analgesia with IV acetaminophen or placebo every 6 hours for 48 hours and postoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol starting at chest closure and continued for up to 6 hours (acetaminophen and dexmedetomidine: n = 29; placebo and dexmedetomidine: n = 30; acetaminophen and propofol: n = 31; placebo and propofol: n = 30).The primary outcome was incidence of postoperative in-hospital delirium by the Confusion Assessment Method. Secondary outcomes included delirium duration, cognitive decline, breakthrough analgesia within the first 48 hours, and ICU and hospital length of stay.Among 121 patients randomized (median age, 69 years; 19 women [15.8%]), 120 completed the trial. Patients treated with IV acetaminophen had a significant reduction in delirium (10% vs 28% placebo; difference, -18% [95% CI, -32% to -5%]; P = .01; HR, 2.8 [95% CI, 1.1-7.8]). Patients receiving dexmedetomidine vs propofol had no significant difference in delirium (17% vs 21%; difference, -4% [95% CI, -18% to 10%]; P = .54; HR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.4-1.9]). There were significant differences favoring acetaminophen vs placebo for 3 prespecified secondary outcomes: delirium duration (median, 1 vs 2 days; difference, -1 [95% CI, -2 to 0]), ICU length of stay (median, 29.5 vs 46.7 hours; difference, -16.7 [95% CI, -20.3 to -0.8]), and breakthrough analgesia (median, 322.5 vs 405.3 µg morphine equivalents; difference, -83 [95% CI, -154 to -14]). For dexmedetomidine vs propofol, only breakthrough analgesia was significantly different (median, 328.8 vs 397.5 µg; difference, -69 [95% CI, -155 to -4]; P = .04). Fourteen patients in both the placebo-dexmedetomidine and acetaminophen-propofol groups (46% and 45%) and 7 in the acetaminophen-dexmedetomidine and placebo-propofol groups (24% and 23%) had hypotension.Among older patients undergoing cardiac surgery, postoperative scheduled IV acetaminophen, combined with IV propofol or dexmedetomidine, reduced in-hospital delirium vs placebo. Additional research, including comparison of IV vs oral acetaminophen and other potentially opioid-sparing analgesics, on the incidence of postoperative delirium is warranted.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02546765.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
huc发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Responsive完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
二指断沧澜完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
亓大大发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
周凡淇发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
朴实的香露完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
拼搏菲鹰完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
小唐要加油完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
科研顺利完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
渔夫完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
SciGPT应助蓝冬采纳,获得10
7秒前
biochen完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
所所应助晴晴采纳,获得10
7秒前
绿野仙踪完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
YY发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
jj完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
想做哥哥的伞钯完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
治愈发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
左丘完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
小二郎应助闪闪龙猫采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
Akim应助快乐的冬卉采纳,获得10
11秒前
鱿鱼完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
aaa0001984发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
cfghjj给cfghjj的求助进行了留言
14秒前
无聊的生活完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
顺利水杯发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
yufanhui举报顺利毕业求助涉嫌违规
14秒前
周凡淇发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
wanci应助Sekiro采纳,获得10
15秒前
小白鸽完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
Ava应助真实的储采纳,获得10
16秒前
lifeng完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 800
Essentials of thematic analysis 700
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Внешняя политика КНР: о сущности внешнеполитического курса современного китайского руководства 500
Revolution und Konterrevolution in China [by A. Losowsky] 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3121955
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2772328
关于积分的说明 7713167
捐赠科研通 2427820
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1289480
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 621451
版权声明 600169