清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Individualised prediction model of seizure recurrence and long-term outcomes after withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in seizure-free patients: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 列线图 癫痫 不利影响 梅德林 研究异质性 儿科 内科学 精神科 政治学 法学
作者
Herm J. Lamberink,Willem M. Otte,Ada T. Geerts,Milen Pavlović,Julio Ramos-Lizana,Anthony G Marson,J. Overweg,Letícia Sauma,Luigi Maria Specchio,Michael B. Tennison,Tânia Marchiori Cardoso,Shlomo Shinnar,Dieter Schmidt,Karin Geleijns,Kees P. J. Braun
出处
期刊:Lancet Neurology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:16 (7): 523-531 被引量:266
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30114-x
摘要

Background People with epilepsy who became seizure-free while taking antiepileptic drugs might consider discontinuing their medication, with the possibility of increased quality of life because of the elimination of adverse events. The risk with this action, however, is seizure recurrence. The objectives of our study were to identify predictors of seizure recurrence and long-term seizure outcomes and to produce nomograms for estimation of individualised outcomes. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis, and identified eligible articles and candidate predictors, using PubMed and Embase databases with a last update on Nov 6, 2014. Eligible articles had to report on cohorts of patients with epilepsy who were seizure-free and had started withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs; articles also had to contain information regarding seizure recurrences during and after withdrawal. We excluded surgical cohorts, reports with fewer than 30 patients, and reports on acute symptomatic seizures because these topics were beyond the scope of our objective. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies system. Data analysis was based on individual participant data. Survival curves and proportional hazards were computed. The strongest predictors were selected with backward selection. Models were converted to nomograms and a web-based tool to determine individual risks. Findings We identified 45 studies with 7082 patients; ten studies (22%) with 1769 patients (25%) were included in the meta-analysis. Median follow-up was 5·3 years (IQR 3·0–10·0, maximum 23 years). Prospective and retrospective studies and randomised controlled trials were included, covering non-selected and selected populations of both children and adults. Relapse occurred in 812 (46%) of 1769 patients; 136 (9%) of 1455 for whom data were available had seizures in their last year of follow-up, suggesting enduring seizure control was not regained by this timepoint. Independent predictors of seizure recurrence were epilepsy duration before remission, seizure-free interval before antiepileptic drug withdrawal, age at onset of epilepsy, history of febrile seizures, number of seizures before remission, absence of a self-limiting epilepsy syndrome, developmental delay, and epileptiform abnormality on electroencephalogram (EEG) before withdrawal. Independent predictors of seizures in the last year of follow-up were epilepsy duration before remission, seizure-free interval before antiepileptic drug withdrawal, number of antiepileptic drugs before withdrawal, female sex, family history of epilepsy, number of seizures before remission, focal seizures, and epileptiform abnormality on EEG before withdrawal. Adjusted concordance statistics were 0·65 (95% CI 0·65–0·66) for predicting seizure recurrence and 0·71 (0·70–0·71) for predicting long-term seizure freedom. Validation was stable across the individual study populations. Interpretation We present evidence-based nomograms with robust performance across populations of children and adults. The nomograms facilitate prediction of outcomes following drug withdrawal for the individual patient, including both the risk of relapse and the chance of long-term freedom from seizures. The main limitations were the absence of a control group continuing antiepileptic drug treatment and a consistent definition of long-term seizure freedom. Funding Epilepsiefonds.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Lingzi发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
白桦哼小调完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
叶远望完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
wujiwuhui完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
willcrystal完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
光能使者完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Lingzi发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
2分钟前
两个榴莲完成签到,获得积分0
2分钟前
wangye发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
科研通AI6.3应助wangye采纳,获得10
3分钟前
田帅完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
李志全完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
Owen应助wu采纳,获得10
4分钟前
wu完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
wu发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
5分钟前
阿玛迪乌斯完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
6分钟前
sidashu发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
qinghe完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
sidashu发布了新的文献求助100
6分钟前
桐桐应助sidashu采纳,获得10
7分钟前
勤劳觅风完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
一二完成签到,获得积分10
8分钟前
小蘑菇应助一二采纳,获得10
8分钟前
瑞瑞完成签到,获得积分10
8分钟前
9分钟前
9分钟前
跳跃黄豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
10分钟前
没时间解释了完成签到 ,获得积分10
11分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11分钟前
yumeng完成签到 ,获得积分10
12分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry, Drug Discovery and Development, Volumes 1 - 8, 8 Volume Set, 8th Edition 1800
Cronologia da história de Macau 1600
Netter collection Volume 9 Part I upper digestive tract及Part III Liver Biliary Pancreas 3rd 2024 的超高清PDF,大小约几百兆,不是几十兆版本的 1050
Current concept for improving treatment of prostate cancer based on combination of LH-RH agonists with other agents 1000
Research Handbook on the Law of the Sea 1000
Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (3rd Edition) 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 细胞生物学 基因 电极 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6166034
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7993541
关于积分的说明 16621020
捐赠科研通 5272186
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2812821
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1792757
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1658841