坚持
猕猴
卡片分类
推论
动物认知
任务(项目管理)
认知
人工智能
计算机科学
机器学习
心理学
比较认知
威斯康星卡片分类测试
认知心理学
神经科学
管理
经济
神经心理学
作者
Vishwa Goudar,Jeong-Woo Kim,Yue Liu,Adam J. O. Dede,Michael J. Jutras,Ivan Skelin,Michael Ruvalcaba,William K. Chang,Bhargavi Ram,Adrienne L. Fairhall,Jack J. Lin,Robert T. Knight,Elizabeth A. Buffalo,Xiao‐Jing Wang
标识
DOI:10.1523/jneurosci.0231-23.2024
摘要
Interspecies comparisons are key to deriving an understanding of the behavioral and neural correlates of human cognition from animal models. We perform a detailed comparison of the strategies of female macaque monkeys to male and female humans on a variant of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), a widely studied and applied task that provides a multiattribute measure of cognitive function and depends on the frontal lobe. WCST performance requires the inference of a rule change given ambiguous feedback. We found that well-trained monkeys infer new rules three times more slowly than minimally instructed humans. Input-dependent hidden Markov model–generalized linear models were fit to their choices, revealing hidden states akin to feature-based attention in both species. Decision processes resembled a win–stay, lose–shift strategy with interspecies similarities as well as key differences. Monkeys and humans both test multiple rule hypotheses over a series of rule-search trials and perform inference-like computations to exclude candidate choice options. We quantitatively show that perseveration, random exploration, and poor sensitivity to negative feedback account for the slower task-switching performance in monkeys.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI