Monitoring the effects of automated gas control of sevoflurane versus target-guided propofol infusion on hemodynamics of liver patients during liver resection. A randomized controlled trial

异丙酚 医学 七氟醚 麻醉 脑电双频指数 靶控输注 血流动力学 随机对照试验 肝硬化 平均动脉压 血压 心输出量 心率 外科 内科学 瑞芬太尼
作者
Yasmeen Abdelsalam Kamel,Noura Adel Ghareeb Sasa,Safaa Mohamed Helal,Hatem A. Attallah,Khaled Yassen
出处
期刊:Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology [Medknow]
卷期号:39 (1): 74-83 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.4103/joacp.joacp_168_21
摘要

Background and Aims: Cirrhotic patients are prone to hypotension during anesthesia. The primary aim of the study was to compare the effects of automated gas control (AGC) of sevoflurane and target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol on systemic and cardiac hemodynamics in hepatitis C cirrhotic patients undergoing surgery. The secondary aim was to compare the recovery, complications, and costs between the two groups. Material and Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial in adults with hepatitis C cirrhosis (Child A) who underwent open liver resection and received AGC (n = 25) or TCI (n = 25). AGC was initially set at FiO 2 40% and end-tidal sevoflurane (ET SEVO) at 2.0% with a fresh gas flow of 300 mL/min. TCI of propofol was given using Marsh pharmacokinetic mode with an initial propofol target concentration (Cpt) of 4 μg/mL. Bispectral index score (BIS) was maintained between 40 and 60. Invasive arterial blood pressure (IBP), electrical cardiometry (EC), cardiac output (CO), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR), Fi SEVO, ET SEVO, propofol Cpt, and effect-site concentration (Ce) were recorded. Results: IBP and EC CO, and SVR were least affected by TCI propofol. Only one (4.00%) patient required vasopressors with TCI vs. 4 (16.00%) with AGC (χ 2 (Y) (df = 1) = 0.88, P (Y) = 0.34). There was no delayed recovery, hypoxia, or awareness; however, ICU stay was shorter with TCI, (P = 0.006). BIS and EC guided median of ET SEVO was 1.90%, Fi SEVO was 2.10% with AGC, and propofol Cpt and Ce were 3.00 μg/dL with TCI. Only 0.14 [0.12–0.15] mL/min of SEVO was consumed with AGC and 0.87 [0.85–0.97] mL/min propofol with TCI. The cost was higher with TCI, P < 0.00. Conclusions: Both techniques are well tolerated hemodynamically, but TCI-propofol was found to be hemodynamically better. The recovery and complications were comparable in both groups, but TCI Propofol infusion was costlier.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
科研通AI2S应助滕皓轩采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
8秒前
阿伟发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
哈哈哈哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
包容若风发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
molihuakai应助carly采纳,获得10
11秒前
Lucas应助菜菜酱爱火锅采纳,获得10
12秒前
科研通AI6.2应助水123采纳,获得30
13秒前
田様应助灵巧的静枫采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
pyridine完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
Danlala完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
深情安青应助李昕123采纳,获得80
18秒前
rr发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
迅速沛凝发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
一亩蔬菜发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
香蕉萝完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
英姑应助甜美白云采纳,获得10
21秒前
张欢馨应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
21秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
22秒前
Nexus应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
22秒前
22秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
22秒前
斯文败类应助Yaojun采纳,获得10
23秒前
25秒前
26秒前
田様应助sjn采纳,获得10
28秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6521583
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8314888
关于积分的说明 17786949
捐赠科研通 5623859
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2927686
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1904458
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1764637