Monitoring the effects of automated gas control of sevoflurane versus target-guided propofol infusion on hemodynamics of liver patients during liver resection. A randomized controlled trial

异丙酚 医学 七氟醚 麻醉 脑电双频指数 靶控输注 血流动力学 随机对照试验 肝硬化 平均动脉压 血压 心输出量 心率 外科 内科学 瑞芬太尼
作者
Yasmeen Abdelsalam Kamel,Noura Adel Ghareeb Sasa,Safaa Mohamed Helal,Hatem A. Attallah,Khaled Yassen
出处
期刊:Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology [Medknow Publications]
卷期号:39 (1): 74-83 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.4103/joacp.joacp_168_21
摘要

Background and Aims: Cirrhotic patients are prone to hypotension during anesthesia. The primary aim of the study was to compare the effects of automated gas control (AGC) of sevoflurane and target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol on systemic and cardiac hemodynamics in hepatitis C cirrhotic patients undergoing surgery. The secondary aim was to compare the recovery, complications, and costs between the two groups. Material and Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial in adults with hepatitis C cirrhosis (Child A) who underwent open liver resection and received AGC (n = 25) or TCI (n = 25). AGC was initially set at FiO 2 40% and end-tidal sevoflurane (ET SEVO) at 2.0% with a fresh gas flow of 300 mL/min. TCI of propofol was given using Marsh pharmacokinetic mode with an initial propofol target concentration (Cpt) of 4 μg/mL. Bispectral index score (BIS) was maintained between 40 and 60. Invasive arterial blood pressure (IBP), electrical cardiometry (EC), cardiac output (CO), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR), Fi SEVO, ET SEVO, propofol Cpt, and effect-site concentration (Ce) were recorded. Results: IBP and EC CO, and SVR were least affected by TCI propofol. Only one (4.00%) patient required vasopressors with TCI vs. 4 (16.00%) with AGC (χ 2 (Y) (df = 1) = 0.88, P (Y) = 0.34). There was no delayed recovery, hypoxia, or awareness; however, ICU stay was shorter with TCI, (P = 0.006). BIS and EC guided median of ET SEVO was 1.90%, Fi SEVO was 2.10% with AGC, and propofol Cpt and Ce were 3.00 μg/dL with TCI. Only 0.14 [0.12–0.15] mL/min of SEVO was consumed with AGC and 0.87 [0.85–0.97] mL/min propofol with TCI. The cost was higher with TCI, P < 0.00. Conclusions: Both techniques are well tolerated hemodynamically, but TCI-propofol was found to be hemodynamically better. The recovery and complications were comparable in both groups, but TCI Propofol infusion was costlier.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
cwn完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
zhuzhu完成签到,获得积分0
刚刚
丘比特应助彩色的蓝天采纳,获得10
刚刚
ChoccyPasta完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
感动的冬云完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
嘤嘤嘤发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
wuhaixia完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
正版DY完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
333发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
醒醒发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
xfxx发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Sissi完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
校长完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
尼亚吉拉完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
布布发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Zhang发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
qinqin发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
顾夏包发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
钰宁发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
NexusExplorer应助ZZZ采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
顺心书琴完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
习习应助Nifeng采纳,获得10
7秒前
mrmrer发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
9秒前
MUSTer一一完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
通通通完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
务实的菓完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
似水流年完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
An慧完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Hello应助阿金采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
12秒前
顾夏包完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
小土豆发布了新的文献求助50
13秒前
科研通AI5应助跑在颖采纳,获得10
13秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527849
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107938
关于积分的说明 9287239
捐赠科研通 2805706
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540033
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716893
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709794