Reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review

情绪化进食 暴食 心理学 肥胖 奖励制度 临床心理学 进食行为 渴望食物 比例(比率) 渴求 发展心理学 医学 饮食失调 精神科 上瘾 内科学 物理 量子力学 心理治疗师
作者
Cassandra A Sutton,Alexa L’Insalata,Tera L. Fazzino
出处
期刊:Physiology & Behavior [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:252: 113843-113843 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113843
摘要

Previous research has identified reward sensitivity as an important factor that may contribute to the engagement in eating behavior (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating, etc.) and increase obesity risk. In the current study, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the relationships between reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes. The study focused on two commonly used measures of reward sensitivity in the literature: the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) and the Behavioral Inhibition Scale/Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS Scale).We conducted a systematic search to identify studies that analyzed reward sensitivity as a predictor of eating behavior or obesity-related outcomes, and measured reward sensitivity using the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale. The search yielded N=19 total publications included in the review.Findings indicated that reward sensitivity, primarily measured by summary scores on the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale, were positively associated with a variety of eating behaviors and obesity-related outcomes with small to moderate effect sizes. Findings were most consistent across studies that examined the association between reward sensitivity and eating behavior outcomes (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating) (r values= .08 to .41; p values < .001 to p < .05) and food consumption outcomes (e.g., palatable food intake) (r values = .21 to .40; p < .001 to p values < .05). Findings were less consistent for food craving and BMI outcomes, and revealed these relationships may depend on individual-level factors and/or environment-related factors, (e.g., food cues). A quality evaluation using the Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) indicated that most studies were rated as moderate to strong quality (84%).Findings indicate that elevated reward sensitivity may be a risk factor for engagement in eating behaviors that may increase obesity risk.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Greg完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
迷路凝芙完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
威武的荷花完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
暖暖完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
无限的惜海完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
YangSY发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
的如发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
hhh完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
Astoria完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
踏实的初珍完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
10秒前
Ava应助西南林彭于晏采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
乐乐应助知性的绿旋采纳,获得10
13秒前
核桃包完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
繁花发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
明捷完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
cdercder应助积极的可云采纳,获得10
16秒前
12458完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
20秒前
21秒前
桃洛璟完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
英姑应助kiki采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
bkagyin应助LHT采纳,获得10
23秒前
聪慧的盼望完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
繁花完成签到,获得积分20
24秒前
25秒前
的如完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
Prescott's Microbiology: 2026 Release ISE 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
Environmental Leverage in Times of Climate Crisis: Product Standards, Carbon Border Measures and Preferential Trade Agreements 1000
Interactions of Vowel Quality and Prosody in East Slavic 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7169591
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8811309
关于积分的说明 18616451
捐赠科研通 6782878
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3166738
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2307843
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2141435