Reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review

情绪化进食 暴食 心理学 肥胖 奖励制度 临床心理学 进食行为 渴望食物 比例(比率) 渴求 发展心理学 医学 饮食失调 精神科 上瘾 内科学 物理 量子力学 心理治疗师
作者
Cassandra A Sutton,Alexa L’Insalata,Tera L. Fazzino
出处
期刊:Physiology & Behavior [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:252: 113843-113843 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113843
摘要

Previous research has identified reward sensitivity as an important factor that may contribute to the engagement in eating behavior (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating, etc.) and increase obesity risk. In the current study, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the relationships between reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes. The study focused on two commonly used measures of reward sensitivity in the literature: the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) and the Behavioral Inhibition Scale/Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS Scale).We conducted a systematic search to identify studies that analyzed reward sensitivity as a predictor of eating behavior or obesity-related outcomes, and measured reward sensitivity using the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale. The search yielded N=19 total publications included in the review.Findings indicated that reward sensitivity, primarily measured by summary scores on the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale, were positively associated with a variety of eating behaviors and obesity-related outcomes with small to moderate effect sizes. Findings were most consistent across studies that examined the association between reward sensitivity and eating behavior outcomes (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating) (r values= .08 to .41; p values < .001 to p < .05) and food consumption outcomes (e.g., palatable food intake) (r values = .21 to .40; p < .001 to p values < .05). Findings were less consistent for food craving and BMI outcomes, and revealed these relationships may depend on individual-level factors and/or environment-related factors, (e.g., food cues). A quality evaluation using the Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) indicated that most studies were rated as moderate to strong quality (84%).Findings indicate that elevated reward sensitivity may be a risk factor for engagement in eating behaviors that may increase obesity risk.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
寻觅完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
0b3cura完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
华仔的应助被neversay4ever采纳,获得10
3秒前
烛残发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
司司发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
阳佟水蓉发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
枯荣莲败完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
深情安青的应助被丧失采纳,获得10
6秒前
浅浅殇完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
赘婿的应助被张国麒采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
脑洞疼的应助被风趣小蜜蜂采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
感谢大佬帮助完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
自然的幻竹完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
旺仔同学发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
好的完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
赘婿的应助被ZCR采纳,获得30
13秒前
英俊的铭的应助被kjinm采纳,获得10
13秒前
情怀的应助被byw采纳,获得10
13秒前
妘婴发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
晚风发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
day_on完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
赘婿的应助被phonetwo采纳,获得10
17秒前
852的应助被落寞无招采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
xuanxuan发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
狸狸发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
今后的应助被apricity199采纳,获得10
19秒前
xing_xing的应助被茜你亦首歌采纳,获得20
20秒前
Lucas的应助被烛残采纳,获得10
21秒前
大道无形我有型完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
在水一方的应助被LJH采纳,获得10
21秒前
soilman的应助被Ray采纳,获得10
21秒前
小马发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Représentation chimique de la structure des kérogènes et des asphaltènes en fonction de leur origine et de leur degré d'évolution 800
Oncology Clinical Trials: Successful Design, Conduct, and Analysis, Second Edition 800
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Organizational Behavior 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8054031
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9481097
关于积分的说明 21305549
捐赠科研通 7622039
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3394140
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2525052
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2432207