Reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review

情绪化进食 暴食 心理学 肥胖 奖励制度 临床心理学 进食行为 渴望食物 比例(比率) 渴求 发展心理学 医学 饮食失调 精神科 上瘾 内科学 物理 量子力学 心理治疗师
作者
Cassandra A Sutton,Alexa L’Insalata,Tera L. Fazzino
出处
期刊:Physiology & Behavior [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:252: 113843-113843 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113843
摘要

Previous research has identified reward sensitivity as an important factor that may contribute to the engagement in eating behavior (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating, etc.) and increase obesity risk. In the current study, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the relationships between reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes. The study focused on two commonly used measures of reward sensitivity in the literature: the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) and the Behavioral Inhibition Scale/Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS Scale).We conducted a systematic search to identify studies that analyzed reward sensitivity as a predictor of eating behavior or obesity-related outcomes, and measured reward sensitivity using the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale. The search yielded N=19 total publications included in the review.Findings indicated that reward sensitivity, primarily measured by summary scores on the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale, were positively associated with a variety of eating behaviors and obesity-related outcomes with small to moderate effect sizes. Findings were most consistent across studies that examined the association between reward sensitivity and eating behavior outcomes (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating) (r values= .08 to .41; p values < .001 to p < .05) and food consumption outcomes (e.g., palatable food intake) (r values = .21 to .40; p < .001 to p values < .05). Findings were less consistent for food craving and BMI outcomes, and revealed these relationships may depend on individual-level factors and/or environment-related factors, (e.g., food cues). A quality evaluation using the Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) indicated that most studies were rated as moderate to strong quality (84%).Findings indicate that elevated reward sensitivity may be a risk factor for engagement in eating behaviors that may increase obesity risk.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zkttxs完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
zxy完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
周一更发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
领导范儿应助疾风采纳,获得10
2秒前
littleboat完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
傅立叶发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
学术孤儿应助45usd采纳,获得20
7秒前
小白白完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
ysf完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
lzp完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
SciGPT应助袁之夺采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
cdercder应助王童采纳,获得10
9秒前
甜蜜的飞绿应助王童采纳,获得10
9秒前
个性严青发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
满意沛槐完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
害怕的胡萝卜完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
充电宝应助半胱氨酸采纳,获得10
14秒前
zorow发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
ASH应助NEYMAR采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
科研通AI6.3应助weeeen采纳,获得10
17秒前
安详乌龟完成签到,获得积分0
18秒前
WX完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
斯文败类应助滴滴采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
jkhjkhj完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
英俊的铭应助傅立叶采纳,获得10
22秒前
22秒前
22秒前
风格化橙完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
Analytical Separation Science 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7547330
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9130759
关于积分的说明 19508064
捐赠科研通 7141317
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3259617
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2426462
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2248136