已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review

情绪化进食 暴食 心理学 肥胖 奖励制度 临床心理学 进食行为 渴望食物 比例(比率) 渴求 发展心理学 医学 饮食失调 精神科 上瘾 内科学 物理 量子力学 心理治疗师
作者
Cassandra A Sutton,Alexa L’Insalata,Tera L. Fazzino
出处
期刊:Physiology & Behavior [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:252: 113843-113843 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113843
摘要

Previous research has identified reward sensitivity as an important factor that may contribute to the engagement in eating behavior (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating, etc.) and increase obesity risk. In the current study, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the relationships between reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes. The study focused on two commonly used measures of reward sensitivity in the literature: the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) and the Behavioral Inhibition Scale/Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS Scale).We conducted a systematic search to identify studies that analyzed reward sensitivity as a predictor of eating behavior or obesity-related outcomes, and measured reward sensitivity using the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale. The search yielded N=19 total publications included in the review.Findings indicated that reward sensitivity, primarily measured by summary scores on the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale, were positively associated with a variety of eating behaviors and obesity-related outcomes with small to moderate effect sizes. Findings were most consistent across studies that examined the association between reward sensitivity and eating behavior outcomes (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating) (r values= .08 to .41; p values < .001 to p < .05) and food consumption outcomes (e.g., palatable food intake) (r values = .21 to .40; p < .001 to p values < .05). Findings were less consistent for food craving and BMI outcomes, and revealed these relationships may depend on individual-level factors and/or environment-related factors, (e.g., food cues). A quality evaluation using the Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) indicated that most studies were rated as moderate to strong quality (84%).Findings indicate that elevated reward sensitivity may be a risk factor for engagement in eating behaviors that may increase obesity risk.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
XPDHW发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
包容的妙芙完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
CipherSage应助tomqas采纳,获得10
4秒前
脑洞疼应助XPDHW采纳,获得10
6秒前
白水发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
英姑应助Sience采纳,获得10
9秒前
13秒前
14秒前
独特的项链完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
17秒前
科研通AI2S应助Zhao采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
炙热初翠发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
weixia发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Sience发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
打工仔发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
23秒前
嘻嘻嘻发布了新的文献求助30
25秒前
科研通AI2S应助飞飞采纳,获得10
26秒前
吱吱吱吱完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
ZS-完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
tomqas发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
爱大美完成签到,获得积分20
27秒前
顏泰楊完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
Akim应助AmengWu采纳,获得10
29秒前
爱大美发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
Akim应助耍酷的白梦采纳,获得10
30秒前
繁荣的雨南完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
桐桐应助qqqxun采纳,获得10
32秒前
我是老大应助通宵的灯采纳,获得10
32秒前
哈基米曼波完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
顺其自然完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
37秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
38秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Reducing Compassion Fatigue, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Burnout 600
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Mammalian Synthetic Biology 500
Auslegungsgeschichte 500
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7639370
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9212534
关于积分的说明 19762388
捐赠科研通 7206078
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3276019
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2437571
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2273263