Reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review

情绪化进食 暴食 心理学 肥胖 奖励制度 临床心理学 进食行为 渴望食物 比例(比率) 渴求 发展心理学 医学 饮食失调 精神科 上瘾 内科学 物理 量子力学 心理治疗师
作者
Cassandra A Sutton,Alexa L’Insalata,Tera L. Fazzino
出处
期刊:Physiology & Behavior [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:252: 113843-113843 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113843
摘要

Previous research has identified reward sensitivity as an important factor that may contribute to the engagement in eating behavior (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating, etc.) and increase obesity risk. In the current study, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the relationships between reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes. The study focused on two commonly used measures of reward sensitivity in the literature: the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) and the Behavioral Inhibition Scale/Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS Scale).We conducted a systematic search to identify studies that analyzed reward sensitivity as a predictor of eating behavior or obesity-related outcomes, and measured reward sensitivity using the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale. The search yielded N=19 total publications included in the review.Findings indicated that reward sensitivity, primarily measured by summary scores on the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale, were positively associated with a variety of eating behaviors and obesity-related outcomes with small to moderate effect sizes. Findings were most consistent across studies that examined the association between reward sensitivity and eating behavior outcomes (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating) (r values= .08 to .41; p values < .001 to p < .05) and food consumption outcomes (e.g., palatable food intake) (r values = .21 to .40; p < .001 to p values < .05). Findings were less consistent for food craving and BMI outcomes, and revealed these relationships may depend on individual-level factors and/or environment-related factors, (e.g., food cues). A quality evaluation using the Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) indicated that most studies were rated as moderate to strong quality (84%).Findings indicate that elevated reward sensitivity may be a risk factor for engagement in eating behaviors that may increase obesity risk.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
爆米花应助陈蒙医生采纳,获得10
刚刚
科研通AI6.4应助dom采纳,获得10
2秒前
nicoleJ发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
干饭完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
小右完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
共享精神应助优雅的橘子采纳,获得10
5秒前
qaqu应助王一一采纳,获得10
6秒前
Jasper应助sunn采纳,获得10
7秒前
vivid发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
青鱼完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
11秒前
张欢馨应助旷野采纳,获得10
12秒前
科研通AI6.2应助任浩采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
坚强飞扬完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Akim应助亢kxh采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
干净的琦应助moshang采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
keroro发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
隐形曼青应助坤坤采纳,获得10
20秒前
小红帽完成签到 ,获得积分20
21秒前
张欢馨应助会飞的鱼采纳,获得10
21秒前
科研通AI6.3应助dom采纳,获得10
23秒前
搜集达人应助yichen采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
科研狗应助prosmail采纳,获得50
24秒前
24秒前
25秒前
Laskujgkjbvg发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
29秒前
顺利语山完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
31秒前
32秒前
美满的酸奶完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
英姑应助哈基咪采纳,获得10
32秒前
亢kxh发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
小周发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
36秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Discerning Saints: Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation and Selective Prosociality at Work 500
Handbuch Trainingswissenschaft – Trainingslehre 500
Additive Manufacturing Design and Applications (ASM Handbook, Volume 24A) 500
Variations: A More Diverse Picture of Contemporary Art 400
Induction Heating and Heat Treatment (ASM Handbook, Volume 4C) 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7589261
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9167150
关于积分的说明 19621037
捐赠科研通 7168988
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3267113
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2432050
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2259271