亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review

情绪化进食 暴食 心理学 肥胖 奖励制度 临床心理学 进食行为 渴望食物 比例(比率) 渴求 发展心理学 医学 饮食失调 精神科 上瘾 内科学 物理 量子力学 心理治疗师
作者
Cassandra A Sutton,Alexa L’Insalata,Tera L. Fazzino
出处
期刊:Physiology & Behavior [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:252: 113843-113843 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113843
摘要

Previous research has identified reward sensitivity as an important factor that may contribute to the engagement in eating behavior (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating, etc.) and increase obesity risk. In the current study, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the relationships between reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes. The study focused on two commonly used measures of reward sensitivity in the literature: the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) and the Behavioral Inhibition Scale/Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS Scale).We conducted a systematic search to identify studies that analyzed reward sensitivity as a predictor of eating behavior or obesity-related outcomes, and measured reward sensitivity using the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale. The search yielded N=19 total publications included in the review.Findings indicated that reward sensitivity, primarily measured by summary scores on the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale, were positively associated with a variety of eating behaviors and obesity-related outcomes with small to moderate effect sizes. Findings were most consistent across studies that examined the association between reward sensitivity and eating behavior outcomes (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating) (r values= .08 to .41; p values < .001 to p < .05) and food consumption outcomes (e.g., palatable food intake) (r values = .21 to .40; p < .001 to p values < .05). Findings were less consistent for food craving and BMI outcomes, and revealed these relationships may depend on individual-level factors and/or environment-related factors, (e.g., food cues). A quality evaluation using the Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) indicated that most studies were rated as moderate to strong quality (84%).Findings indicate that elevated reward sensitivity may be a risk factor for engagement in eating behaviors that may increase obesity risk.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zhangwenkang完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
今后应助悦耳凤灵采纳,获得30
2秒前
科研通AI6.3应助Yo鹿采纳,获得10
4秒前
12秒前
13秒前
18秒前
嘉心糖应助wxnice采纳,获得30
18秒前
情怀应助renard采纳,获得10
18秒前
无花果应助maxiaoyun采纳,获得10
20秒前
zmh1517发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
25秒前
25秒前
神勇青烟完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
坚定灭绝完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
journey完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
MODRIC完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
39秒前
39秒前
虫培应助六一采纳,获得10
44秒前
泽2011完成签到 ,获得积分10
50秒前
50秒前
NEO完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
努力的淼淼完成签到 ,获得积分0
53秒前
数据女工发布了新的文献求助10
54秒前
56秒前
59秒前
yiiy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
59秒前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
59秒前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
59秒前
zmh1517完成签到,获得积分10
59秒前
bzlish发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
隐形曼青应助数据女工采纳,获得10
1分钟前
优雅的帅哥完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
傲震完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
bzlish完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
哈佛得不到的学生完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
zcgy918完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 5000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Evidence Summary. Injection (subcutaneous):op- timal administration 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7489638
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9081361
关于积分的说明 19368421
捐赠科研通 7103151
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3249071
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2418398
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2234462