Reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review

情绪化进食 暴食 心理学 肥胖 奖励制度 临床心理学 进食行为 渴望食物 比例(比率) 渴求 发展心理学 医学 饮食失调 精神科 上瘾 内科学 物理 量子力学 心理治疗师
作者
Cassandra A Sutton,Alexa L’Insalata,Tera L. Fazzino
出处
期刊:Physiology & Behavior [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:252: 113843-113843 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113843
摘要

Previous research has identified reward sensitivity as an important factor that may contribute to the engagement in eating behavior (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating, etc.) and increase obesity risk. In the current study, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the relationships between reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes. The study focused on two commonly used measures of reward sensitivity in the literature: the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) and the Behavioral Inhibition Scale/Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS Scale).We conducted a systematic search to identify studies that analyzed reward sensitivity as a predictor of eating behavior or obesity-related outcomes, and measured reward sensitivity using the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale. The search yielded N=19 total publications included in the review.Findings indicated that reward sensitivity, primarily measured by summary scores on the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale, were positively associated with a variety of eating behaviors and obesity-related outcomes with small to moderate effect sizes. Findings were most consistent across studies that examined the association between reward sensitivity and eating behavior outcomes (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating) (r values= .08 to .41; p values < .001 to p < .05) and food consumption outcomes (e.g., palatable food intake) (r values = .21 to .40; p < .001 to p values < .05). Findings were less consistent for food craving and BMI outcomes, and revealed these relationships may depend on individual-level factors and/or environment-related factors, (e.g., food cues). A quality evaluation using the Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) indicated that most studies were rated as moderate to strong quality (84%).Findings indicate that elevated reward sensitivity may be a risk factor for engagement in eating behaviors that may increase obesity risk.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
时尚黄豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
鲤鱼安青完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
snon发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
内含子发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
活力的向珊完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
Feng发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
111完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
洁净的鹰完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
冷静鱼发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Lbft完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
丰富的含巧完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
哭哭小喵完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
醉熏的忆雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
会厌完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
细心安容完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
荔枝完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
luckySmith完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
kily完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
玛卡巴卡完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
淡定丹琴完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
月光发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Beracah完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
有钱完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
ll发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
sntyc完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
张斯宁完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
滕隐完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
suepisode完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
Cyy12355完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
慧木完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
666发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Metallurgy at high pressures and high temperatures 2000
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
High Pressures-Temperatures Apparatus 1000
Free parameter models in liquid scintillation counting 1000
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
The Organic Chemistry of Biological Pathways Second Edition 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6322786
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8138979
关于积分的说明 17063145
捐赠科研通 5375975
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2853417
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1831110
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1682366