已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review

情绪化进食 暴食 心理学 肥胖 奖励制度 临床心理学 进食行为 渴望食物 比例(比率) 渴求 发展心理学 医学 饮食失调 精神科 上瘾 内科学 物理 量子力学 心理治疗师
作者
Cassandra A Sutton,Alexa L’Insalata,Tera L. Fazzino
出处
期刊:Physiology & Behavior [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:252: 113843-113843 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113843
摘要

Previous research has identified reward sensitivity as an important factor that may contribute to the engagement in eating behavior (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating, etc.) and increase obesity risk. In the current study, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the relationships between reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes. The study focused on two commonly used measures of reward sensitivity in the literature: the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) and the Behavioral Inhibition Scale/Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS Scale).We conducted a systematic search to identify studies that analyzed reward sensitivity as a predictor of eating behavior or obesity-related outcomes, and measured reward sensitivity using the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale. The search yielded N=19 total publications included in the review.Findings indicated that reward sensitivity, primarily measured by summary scores on the SPSRQ or BIS/BAS Scale, were positively associated with a variety of eating behaviors and obesity-related outcomes with small to moderate effect sizes. Findings were most consistent across studies that examined the association between reward sensitivity and eating behavior outcomes (e.g., binge eating, emotional eating) (r values= .08 to .41; p values < .001 to p < .05) and food consumption outcomes (e.g., palatable food intake) (r values = .21 to .40; p < .001 to p values < .05). Findings were less consistent for food craving and BMI outcomes, and revealed these relationships may depend on individual-level factors and/or environment-related factors, (e.g., food cues). A quality evaluation using the Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) indicated that most studies were rated as moderate to strong quality (84%).Findings indicate that elevated reward sensitivity may be a risk factor for engagement in eating behaviors that may increase obesity risk.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
sam完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
科目三应助yu采纳,获得30
5秒前
张欢馨应助秋北采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
研友_LNoAMn发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
D515完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
12秒前
kini发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
W星球Y族人完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
yu发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
24秒前
25秒前
卖艺的读书人完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
枳奺完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
29秒前
30秒前
Singel发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
hnx1005完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
bkagyin应助MAO采纳,获得10
33秒前
34秒前
梅林渔夫发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
多情的凤妖完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
37秒前
傻傻的芷巧完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
美好斓发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
慕青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
38秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
38秒前
38秒前
39秒前
40秒前
单源昊发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
44秒前
流星雨发布了新的文献求助10
46秒前
Nowind发布了新的文献求助10
46秒前
xxxxllll发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
48秒前
kini完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
美满诗槐完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Health Psychology 600
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Discerning Saints: Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation and Selective Prosociality at Work 500
Handbuch Trainingswissenschaft – Trainingslehre 500
Additive Manufacturing Design and Applications (ASM Handbook, Volume 24A) 500
Variations: A More Diverse Picture of Contemporary Art 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7591120
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9168504
关于积分的说明 19624713
捐赠科研通 7169880
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3267424
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2432242
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2259739