Comparison of efficacy and safety of ripertamab (SCT400) versus rituximab (Mabthera®) in combination with CHOP in patients with previously untreated CD20‐positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: A randomized, single‐blind, phase III clinical trial

切碎 医学 美罗华 内科学 临床终点 淋巴瘤 胃肠病学 弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤 置信区间 CD20 随机对照试验
作者
Yuankai Shi,Qingyuan Zhang,Xiaonan Hong,Zhen Wang,Yuhuan Gao,Liqun Zou,Hong Cen,Lin Gui,Yufu Li,Jifeng Feng,Zhao Wang,Mingzhi Zhang,Chuan Jin,Weihua Zhang,Jianda Hu,Chengyun Zheng,Zhendong Zheng,Liling Zhang,Shaoshui Chen,Yunhong Huang,Yun Tang,Yajie Gao,Miaowang Hao,Xiaoling Li,Chunkang Chang,Haiyan Yang,Hui Wu,Lida Shen,Xiaoyan Ke,Liangming Zhang,Yaming Xi,Linhua Yang,Liangzhi Xie,Wenlin Gai,Yanan Ji
出处
期刊:Hematological Oncology [Wiley]
卷期号:40 (5): 930-940 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1002/hon.3054
摘要

Abstract This study compared the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of ripertamab (SCT400) and rituximab (Mabthera ® ) combined with CHOP as the first‐line treatment for Chinese patients with CD20‐positive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This is a randomized, patient‐blind, multicenter, active‐control, non‐inferiority study with parallel design. Patients were randomly (2:1) to receive ripertamab combined with CHOP (S‐CHOP) or rituximab (Mabthera ® ) combined with CHOP (R‐CHOP) for up to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was the Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessed objective response rate (ORR) in full analysis set (FAS) and the per protocol set (PPS). A total of 364 patients (243 in the S‐CHOP and 121 in the R‐CHOP groups) were enrolled in this study. In FAS, IRC‐assessed ORRs were 93.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90.0%, 96.5%) and 94.2% (95% CI: 88.4%, 97.6%) in the S‐CHOP and R‐CHOP groups ( p = 0.9633), respectively. The ORR difference between the two groups −0.4% (95% CI: −5.5%, 4.8%) met the pre‐specified non‐inferiority margin of −12%. There were no significant differences between the S‐CHOP and R‐CHOP groups in 1‐year progression‐free survival rates (81.1% vs. 83.2%, p = 0.8283), 1 year event‐free survival rates (56.2% vs. 58.1%, p = 0.8005), and 3‐year overall survival rates (81.0% vs. 82.8%, p = 0.7183). The results in PPS were consistent with those in FAS. The rates of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and ≥ grade 3 TEAEs were 97.9% and 99.2%, 85.2% and 86.0% in the S‐CHOP and R‐CHOP groups, respectively in safety set. The percentage of anti‐drug antibodies positive patients in the S‐CHOP group was numerically lower than the R‐CHOP group (10.9% vs. 16.0%). This study demonstrated that S‐CHOP was not inferior to R‐CHOP in the first‐line treatment of Chinese patients with CD20‐positive DLBCL in efficacy, safety and immunogenecity. S‐CHOP could be an alternative first‐line standard treatment regimen for this patient population.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
elle发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
yuan完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
JamesPei应助卡不卡不采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
秀丽青枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
小怪兽不吃人完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
yyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
yuan关注了科研通微信公众号
10秒前
11秒前
所所应助9999采纳,获得10
11秒前
haoxin完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
宇宙暴龙战士暴打魔法少女完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
冰凝完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
15秒前
Nhkun发布了新的文献求助60
15秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
18秒前
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
言信果完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
22秒前
陨_0614完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
小二郎应助马家辉采纳,获得10
23秒前
沈佳琪发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
9999完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
27秒前
wenbo完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
小小王完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
9999发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
29秒前
cc应助孙悟空大巨人采纳,获得50
31秒前
慕青应助May采纳,获得30
32秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Le dégorgement réflexe des Acridiens 800
Defense against predation 800
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3134881
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2785770
关于积分的说明 7774093
捐赠科研通 2441601
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1298038
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 625075
版权声明 600825