Staged vs Concurrent Hardware Removal During Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Background

Conversion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the presence of periarticular hardware can be associated with increased resource utilization, complications, and revisions. However, little guidance exists on the optimal approach to hardware removal. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of conversion TKA with hardware removal performed in either a staged or concurrent manner.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of 155 TKA operations performed with staged (45) or concurrent (110) removal of hardware at the time of TKA. Differences in patient data, case data, complications, reoperations, and revisions were evaluated. Subgroup comparisons of cases involving major hardware (plates, nails, rods), minor hardware (screws, buttons, wires), and tibial plates were performed.

Results

There were no differences in age, sex, body mass index, or comorbidities between patients who underwent staged or concurrent hardware removal. Rates of complications, reoperations, and revisions did not differ at multiple time points (90 days, 1 year, 2 years, 4 years). Patients who underwent staged hardware removal were more likely to have had prior surgery for fracture reconstruction (68% vs 33%, P < .001), to have had major hardware removed (84% vs 59%, P = .03), and were less likely to have had hardware removal performed through a single incision with TKA (50% vs 92%, P < .001). Subgroup analysis of major and minor hardware cases demonstrated comparable outcomes.

Conclusion

There remains no established benefit to either a staged or concurrent approach to hardware removal at the time of TKA. This is true regardless of hardware burden. At this time, a case-by-case approach should be taken to conversion TKA in the presence of periarticular hardware.