心源性休克
医学
重症监护医学
心肌梗塞
重症监护
心脏病学
心理干预
内科学
医疗急救
护理部
作者
David A. Baran,Cindy L. Grines,Steven R. Bailey,Daniel Burkhoff,Shelley Hall,Timothy D. Henry,Steven M. Hollenberg,Navin K. Kapur,William W. O’Neill,Joseph P. Ornato,Kelly Stelling,Holger Thiele,Sean van Diepen,Srihari S. Naidu
摘要
Abstract Background The outcome of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction has not appreciably changed in the last 30 years despite the development of various percutaneous mechanical circulatory support options. It is clear that there are varying degrees of cardiogenic shock but there is no robust classification scheme to categorize this disease state. Methods A multidisciplinary group of experts convened by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions was assembled to derive a proposed classification schema for cardiogenic shock. Representatives from cardiology (interventional, advanced heart failure, noninvasive), emergency medicine, critical care, and cardiac nursing all collaborated to develop the proposed schema. Results A system describing stages of cardiogenic shock from A to E was developed. Stage A is “at risk” for cardiogenic shock, stage B is “beginning” shock, stage C is “classic” cardiogenic shock, stage D is “deteriorating”, and E is “extremis”. The difference between stages B and C is the presence of hypoperfusion which is present in stages C and higher. Stage D implies that the initial set of interventions chosen have not restored stability and adequate perfusion despite at least 30 minutes of observation and stage E is the patient in extremis, highly unstable, often with cardiovascular collapse. Conclusion This proposed classification system is simple, clinically applicable across the care spectrum from pre‐hospital providers to intensive care staff but will require future validation studies to assess its utility and potential prognostic implications.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI