Medications for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline

医学 对乙酰氨基酚 曲马多 慢性疼痛 腰痛 物理疗法 背痛 指南 人口 梅德林 不利影响 系统回顾 随机对照试验 重症监护医学 止痛药 替代医学 内科学 麻醉 环境卫生 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Roger Chou,Laurie Hoyt Huffman
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:147 (7): 505-505 被引量:523
标识
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00008
摘要

Background: Medications are the most frequently prescribed therapy for low back pain. A challenge in choosing pharmacologic therapy is that each class of medication is associated with a unique balance of risks and benefits. Purpose: To assess benefits and harms of acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antidepressants, benzodiazepines, antiepileptic drugs, skeletal muscle relaxants, opioid analgesics, tramadol, and systemic corticosteroids for acute or chronic low back pain (with or without leg pain). Data Sources: English-language studies were identified through searches of MEDLINE (through November 2006) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2006, Issue 4). These electronic searches were supplemented by hand searching reference lists and additional citations suggested by experts. Study Selection: Systematic reviews and randomized trials of dual therapy or monotherapy with 1 or more of the preceding medications for acute or chronic low back pain that reported pain outcomes, back-specific function, general health status, work disability, or patient satisfaction. Data Extraction: We abstracted information about study design, population characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and adverse events. To grade methodological quality, we used the Oxman criteria for systematic reviews and the Cochrane Back Review Group criteria for individual trials. Data Synthesis: We found good evidence that NSAIDs, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain) are effective for pain relief. The magnitude of benefit was moderate (effect size of 0.5 to 0.8, improvement of 10 to 20 points on a 100-point visual analogue pain scale, or relative risk of 1.25 to 2.00 for the proportion of patients experiencing clinically significant pain relief), except in the case of tricyclic antidepressants (for which the benefit was small to moderate). We also found fair evidence that acetaminophen, opioids, tramadol, benzodiazepines, and gabapentin (for radiculopathy) are effective for pain relief. We found good evidence that systemic corticosteroids are ineffective. Adverse events, such as sedation, varied by medication, although reliable data on serious and long-term harms are sparse. Most trials were short term (≤4 weeks). Few data address efficacy of dual-medication therapy compared with monotherapy, or beneficial effects on functional outcomes. Limitations: Our primary source of data was systematic reviews. We included non–English-language trials only if they were included in English-language systematic reviews. Conclusions: Medications with good evidence of short-term effectiveness for low back pain are NSAIDs, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain). Evidence is insufficient to identify one medication as offering a clear overall net advantage because of complex tradeoffs between benefits and harms. Individual patients are likely to differ in how they weigh potential benefits, harms, and costs of various medications.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
2秒前
Cloud发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
弦和完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
郭奕廷完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
漫山完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
124发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
9秒前
Akim应助布布采纳,获得10
9秒前
阿肯李发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
CodeCraft应助tidongzhiwu采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
Jjj发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
MX001完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
露西发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
15秒前
杨春天发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
小科比完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
WYY发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
kcarol完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
陈年大苏打完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
神凰发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
李硕发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
顺利的万宝路完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
zs发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
tidongzhiwu发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
28秒前
强博弈完成签到,获得积分20
28秒前
科研通AI2S应助张老师要PB采纳,获得10
30秒前
空空空完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
脑洞疼应助yy采纳,获得10
34秒前
香蕉觅云应助空空空采纳,获得10
35秒前
李硕完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
JamesPei应助杨春天采纳,获得10
39秒前
41秒前
FODCOC发布了新的文献求助200
44秒前
44秒前
高分求助中
Continuum thermodynamics and material modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2500
Healthcare Finance: Modern Financial Analysis for Accelerating Biomedical Innovation 2000
Applications of Emerging Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology 1111
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 1000
Theory of Block Polymer Self-Assembly 750
지식생태학: 생태학, 죽은 지식을 깨우다 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 纳米技术 内科学 物理 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3475587
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3067456
关于积分的说明 9104167
捐赠科研通 2758955
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1513845
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 699823
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 699197