亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Medications for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline

医学 对乙酰氨基酚 曲马多 慢性疼痛 腰痛 物理疗法 背痛 指南 人口 梅德林 不利影响 系统回顾 随机对照试验 重症监护医学 止痛药 替代医学 内科学 麻醉 环境卫生 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Roger Chou,Laurie Hoyt Huffman
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:147 (7): 505-505 被引量:523
标识
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00008
摘要

Background: Medications are the most frequently prescribed therapy for low back pain. A challenge in choosing pharmacologic therapy is that each class of medication is associated with a unique balance of risks and benefits. Purpose: To assess benefits and harms of acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antidepressants, benzodiazepines, antiepileptic drugs, skeletal muscle relaxants, opioid analgesics, tramadol, and systemic corticosteroids for acute or chronic low back pain (with or without leg pain). Data Sources: English-language studies were identified through searches of MEDLINE (through November 2006) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2006, Issue 4). These electronic searches were supplemented by hand searching reference lists and additional citations suggested by experts. Study Selection: Systematic reviews and randomized trials of dual therapy or monotherapy with 1 or more of the preceding medications for acute or chronic low back pain that reported pain outcomes, back-specific function, general health status, work disability, or patient satisfaction. Data Extraction: We abstracted information about study design, population characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and adverse events. To grade methodological quality, we used the Oxman criteria for systematic reviews and the Cochrane Back Review Group criteria for individual trials. Data Synthesis: We found good evidence that NSAIDs, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain) are effective for pain relief. The magnitude of benefit was moderate (effect size of 0.5 to 0.8, improvement of 10 to 20 points on a 100-point visual analogue pain scale, or relative risk of 1.25 to 2.00 for the proportion of patients experiencing clinically significant pain relief), except in the case of tricyclic antidepressants (for which the benefit was small to moderate). We also found fair evidence that acetaminophen, opioids, tramadol, benzodiazepines, and gabapentin (for radiculopathy) are effective for pain relief. We found good evidence that systemic corticosteroids are ineffective. Adverse events, such as sedation, varied by medication, although reliable data on serious and long-term harms are sparse. Most trials were short term (≤4 weeks). Few data address efficacy of dual-medication therapy compared with monotherapy, or beneficial effects on functional outcomes. Limitations: Our primary source of data was systematic reviews. We included non–English-language trials only if they were included in English-language systematic reviews. Conclusions: Medications with good evidence of short-term effectiveness for low back pain are NSAIDs, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain). Evidence is insufficient to identify one medication as offering a clear overall net advantage because of complex tradeoffs between benefits and harms. Individual patients are likely to differ in how they weigh potential benefits, harms, and costs of various medications.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
舒心小海豚完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
CipherSage应助MrFANG采纳,获得10
2秒前
段欣池完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
妮妮发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
Su完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
xx完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
搞论文小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
壮观沉鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
aikeyan完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
NexusExplorer应助热心的绿茶采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
Ycccccc完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
思川发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
Owen应助卷毛维安采纳,获得10
28秒前
Yang完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
姜姗完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
44秒前
48秒前
三三完成签到 ,获得积分0
48秒前
竹筏过海应助典雅的湘采纳,获得30
50秒前
思川发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
英俊的小懒虫完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
54秒前
ss发布了新的文献求助10
55秒前
美好灵寒完成签到 ,获得积分10
59秒前
59秒前
安静的棉花糖完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
小二郎应助wsw111采纳,获得10
1分钟前
aaaaa完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI6.1应助香果采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
小豆芽完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Joshua完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
SciGPT应助白灼虾采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
山石完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
欣欣完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 2000
The Social Psychology of Citizenship 1000
Streptostylie bei Dinosauriern nebst Bemerkungen über die 540
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
Brittle Fracture in Welded Ships 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5920576
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 6903341
关于积分的说明 15813868
捐赠科研通 5047531
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2716237
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1669639
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1606672