等级间信度
限制
支柱
质量(理念)
批判性评价
可靠性(半导体)
忠诚
多元方法论
系统回顾
计算机科学
心理学
医学
梅德林
工程类
化学
物理
教育学
机械工程
发展心理学
功率(物理)
评定量表
替代医学
电信
结构工程
病理
量子力学
生物化学
作者
Quan Nha Hong,Sergi Fàbregues,Gillian Bartlett,Felicity Boardman,Margaret Cargo,Pierre Dagenais,Marie‐Pierre Gagnon,Frances Griffiths,Belinda Nicolau,Alicia O’Cathain,Marie-Claude Rousseau,Isabelle Vedel,Pierre Pluye
出处
期刊:Education for Information
[IOS Press]
日期:2018-11-13
卷期号:34 (4): 285-291
被引量:2145
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Appraising the quality of studies included in systematic reviews combining qualitative and quantitative evidence is challenging. To address this challenge, a critical appraisal tool was developed: the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The aim of this paper is to present the enhance ments made to the MMAT. DEVELOPMENT: The MMAT was initially developed in 2006 based on a literature review on systematic reviews combining qualitative and quantitative evidence. It was subject to pilot and interrater reliability testing. A revised version of the MMAT was developed in 2018 based on the results from usefulness testing, a literature review on critical appraisal tools and a modified e-Delphi study with methodological experts to identify core criteria. TOOL DESCRIPTION: The MMAT assesses the quality of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies. It focuses on methodological criteria and includes five core quality criteria for each of the following five categories of study designs: (a) qualitative, (b) randomized controlled, (c) nonrandomized, (d) quantitative descriptive, and (e) mixed methods. CONCLUSION: The MMAT is a unique tool that can be used to appraise the quality of different study designs. Also, by limiting to core criteria, the MMAT can provide a more efficient appraisal.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI