施密特锤
极限抗拉强度
抗压强度
岩体分类
地质强度指标
岩土工程
线性回归
结构工程
数学
材料科学
地质学
复合材料
工程类
统计
作者
Yiguo Xue,Fanmeng Kong,Shucai Li,Lewen Zhang,Binghua Zhou,Guangkun Li,Huimin Gong
标识
DOI:10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001633
摘要
Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and tensile strength are essential parameters of rocks, but the direct measurement of these two parameters is time-consuming and requires high-quality samples. As such, academics brought attention to the indirect tests (such as point load test, ultrasonic wave velocity test, and Schmidt hammer test) that could be used to estimate UCS and tensile strength quickly. The empirical equations for estimating UCS and tensile strength of rocks in study cases remain poorly understood as previous equations based on indirect testing methods possess a lithological heterogeneity–dependent nature. Laboratory experiments (e.g., uniaxial compressive test, Brazilian test, point load test) and regression analysis were performed to acquire the correlation equations for calculating UCS or tensile strength of rocks based on indirect tests. Significant linear equations were derived and UCS or tensile strength can be estimated by point load test with acceptable discrepancy. The comparison study showed that using improper empirical equations to predict UCS and tensile strength can yield significant errors. A modified basic quality (BQ) rock mass classification system was also presented to conveniently classify the rock mass in study cases.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI