Effect of Gamification With and Without Financial Incentives to Increase Physical Activity Among Veterans Classified as Having Obesity or Overweight

超重 激励 随机对照试验 体质指数 干预(咨询) 减肥 医学 物理疗法 心理学 肥胖 财务 老年学 护理部 业务 外科 内科学 病理 微观经济学 经济
作者
Anish K. Agarwal,Kimberly J. Waddell,Dylan S. Small,Chalanda N. Evans,Tory O. Harrington,Rachel Djaraher,Ai Leen Oon,Mitesh S. Patel
出处
期刊:JAMA network open [American Medical Association]
卷期号:4 (7): e2116256-e2116256 被引量:21
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16256
摘要

Gamification is increasingly being used for health promotion but has not been well tested with financial incentives or among veterans.To test the effectiveness of gamification with social support, with and without a loss-framed financial incentive, to increase physical activity among veterans classified as having overweight and obesity.This 3-group randomized clinical trial had a 12-week intervention period and an 8-week follow-up period. Participants included veterans with a body mass index greater than or equal to 25 who were receiving care from a single site in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Participants underwent a remotely monitored intervention from March 19, 2019, to August 9, 2020. Data analyses were conducted between October 1, 2020, and November 14, 2020.All participants received a wearable device to track step counts and selected a step goal. The control group received feedback from their devices only. Participants in the 2 gamification groups were entered into a 12-week game with points and levels designed using behavioral economic principles and selected a support partner to receive weekly updates. Participants in the loss-framed financial incentive group had $120 allocated to a virtual account and lost $10 if weekly goals were not achieved.The primary outcome was the change in mean daily steps from baseline during the intervention. Secondary outcomes include proportion of days goals were achieved and changes during follow-up.A total of 180 participants were randomized, 60 to the gamification with social support group, 60 to the gamification with social support and loss-framed financial incentives group, and 60 to the control group. The participants had a mean (SD) age of 56.5 (12.9) years and a mean (SD) body mass index of 33.0 (5.6); 71 participants (39.4%) were women, 90 (50.0%) were White, and 67 (37.2%) were Black. During the intervention period, compared with control group participants, participants in the gamification with financial incentives group had a significant increase in mean daily steps from baseline (adjusted difference, 1224 steps; 95% CI, 451 to 1996 steps; P = .005), but participants in the gamification without financial incentives group did not (adjusted difference, 433 steps; 95% CI, -337 to 1203 steps; P = .81). The increase for the gamification with financial incentives group was not sustained during the follow-up period, and the step count was not significantly different than that of the control group (adjusted difference, 564 steps; 95% CI, -261 to 1389 steps; P = .37). Compared with the control group, participants in the intervention groups had a significantly higher adjusted proportion of days meeting their step goal during the main intervention and follow-up period (gamification with social support group, adjusted difference from control, 0.21 participant-day; 95% CI, 0.18-0.24 participant-day; P < .001; gamification with social support and loss-framed financial incentive group, adjusted difference from control, 0.34 participant-day; 95% CI, 0.31-0.37 participant-day; P < .001).Among veterans classified as having overweight and obesity, gamification with social support combined with loss-framed financial incentives was associated with a modest increase in physical activity during the intervention period, but the increase was not sustained during follow-up. Gamification without incentives did not significantly change physical activity.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03563027.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
英姑应助lanhu采纳,获得10
2秒前
田様应助QSY采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
一五完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
脑洞疼应助LSY采纳,获得10
6秒前
好好想想完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
zz完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
CodeCraft应助冷傲玫瑰采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
小白完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
科研通AI2S应助彩虹采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
小张完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
lwl完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
小青新完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
18秒前
...完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
快乐十八发布了新的文献求助20
21秒前
22秒前
舒适丹雪完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
昔昔发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
23秒前
冷傲玫瑰发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
kaito发布了新的文献求助30
27秒前
QSY发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
29秒前
瞿霞完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
33秒前
35秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助Cassie采纳,获得10
35秒前
orixero应助某某采纳,获得10
37秒前
害怕的宝川完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
酷波er应助QSY采纳,获得10
39秒前
40秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Le dégorgement réflexe des Acridiens 800
Defense against predation 800
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3136281
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2787312
关于积分的说明 7780828
捐赠科研通 2443293
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1299081
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 625325
版权声明 600905