汽化
医学
激光汽化
围手术期
随机对照试验
泌尿科
外科
激光器
化学
光学
物理
有机化学
作者
Tatsunori Okada,Mikifumi Koura,Ryota Sumikawa,Hiroyuki Masaoka,YooHyun Song,Takashi Dejima,Narihito Seki
摘要
Abstract Objectives This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of three different laser prostate vaporization surgeries, which were photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), diode laser vaporization (DVP), and thulium laser vaporization (ThuVAP), for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a randomized clinical trial. Methods A total of 71 consecutive patients with BPH were included; 23 patients were treated with PVP, 23 with DVP, and 25 with ThuVAP. Patients were evaluated with disease‐related symptomatic questionnaires, Quality of Life (QOL) Index, and maximum urinary flow rate ( Q max ) for 12 months. Patients were monitored to record operation/vaporization time, 24‐hour hemoglobin/sodium drop, length of catheterization/hospitalization, and perioperative/postoperative complications. Results In all three groups, patients showed significant and comparable improvements in symptom scores, QOL Index, and Q max during the 12‐month follow‐up period. The mean operation/vaporization time was equivalent across all three groups at 69/23 (PVP), 81/34 (DVP), and 76/32 minutes (ThuVAP), while the applied laser energy was lower for PVP at 157 kJ compared to the other two techniques (DVP at 358 kJ, ThuVAP at 240 kJ). The mean vaporization rates per unit energy were significantly different between the three groups (PVP 0.16, DVP 0.09, and ThuVAP 0.09 mL/kJ). There were no significant differences in the main safety profiles between the three groups. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that these three types of laser surgeries are similar in terms of complications and outcomes, with excellent hemostasis and high patient satisfaction. It was suggested that sufficient tissue vaporization could be achieved using less energy through PVP surgery.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI