Substituent and Heteroatom Effects on π–π Interactions: Evidence That Parallel-Displaced π-Stacking is Not Driven by Quadrupolar Electrostatics

Stacking interactions are a recurring motif in supramolecular chemistry and biochemistry, where a persistent theme is a preference for parallel-displaced aromatic rings rather than face-to-face π-stacking. This is typically explained in terms of quadrupole–quadrupole interactions between the arene moieties but that interpretation is inconsistent with accurate calculations, which reveal that the quadrupolar picture is qualitatively wrong. At typical π-stacking distances, quadrupolar electrostatics may differ in sign from an exact calculation based on charge densities of the interacting arenes. We apply symmetry-adapted perturbation theory to dimers composed of substituted benzene and various aromatic heterocycles, which display a wide range of electrostatic interactions, and we investigate the interplay of Pauli repulsion, dispersion, and electrostatics as it pertains to parallel-displaced π-stacking. Profiles of energy components along cofacial slip-stacking coordinates support a prominent role for the "van der Waals model" (dispersion in competition with Pauli repulsion), even for polar monomers where electrostatic interactions are significant. While electrostatic interactions are necessary to explain the optimal face-to-face π-stacking distance and to account for the relative orientation of one polar arene with respect to another, we find no evidence to support continued invocation of quadrupolar electrostatics as a basis for π-stacking. Our results suggest that a driving force for offset-stacking exists even in the absence of electrostatic interactions. Consequently, tuning electrostatics via functionalization does not guarantee that slip-stacking can be avoided. This has implications for rational design of soft materials and other supramolecular architectures.