已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Echocardiographic Detection of Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities Using Artificial Intelligence Compared to Human Readers

医学 人工智能 运动(物理) 内科学 计算机视觉 计算机科学
作者
Jeremy Slivnick,Nils Gessert,Juan Ignacio Cotella,Lucas Silva de Oliveira,Nicola Pezzotti,Parastou Eslami,Ali M. Sadeghi,Simon Wehle,David Prabhu,Irina Waechter‐Stehle,Ashish M. Chaudhari,Teodora Szasz,Linda Lee,Marie Altenburg,Giancarlo Saldana,Michael Randazzo,Jeanne M. DeCara,Karima Addetia,Victor Mor‐Avi,Roberto M. Lang
出处
期刊:Journal of The American Society of Echocardiography [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:37 (7): 655-663 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2024.03.017
摘要

Abstract

Background

Although regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) detection is foundational to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), current methods are prone to inter-observer variability. We aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) model for RWMA assessment and compare it to expert and novice readers.

Methods

We used 15,746 TTE studies—including 25,529 apical videos—which were split into training, validation, and test datasets. A convolutional neural network was trained and validated using apical 2-, 3-, and 4-chamber videos to predict the presence of RWMA in 7 regions defined by coronary perfusion territories, using the ground truth derived from clinical TTE reports. Within the test cohort, DL model accuracy was compared to 6 expert and 3 novice readers using F1 score evaluation, with the ground truth of RWMA defined by expert readers. Significance between the DL model and novices was assessed using the permutation test.

Results

Within the test cohort, the DL model accurately identified any RWMA with AUC 0.96 (0.92-0.98). The mean F1 scores of the experts and the DL model were numerically similar for 6/7 regions: anterior (86 vs 84), anterolateral (80 vs 74), inferolateral (83 vs 87), inferoseptal (86 vs 86), apical (88 vs 87), inferior (79 vs 81), and any RWMA (90 vs 94 respectively), while in the anteroseptal region F1 score of the DL model was lower than the experts (75 vs 89). Using F1 scores, the DL model outperformed both novices 1 (p=0.002) and 2 (p=0.02) for the detection of any RWMA.

Conclusions

DL provides accurate detection of RWMA which was comparable to experts and outperformed a majority of novices. DL may improve the efficiency of RWMA assessment and serve as a teaching tool for novices.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
verdure完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
ryanfeng完成签到,获得积分0
刚刚
momo关注了科研通微信公众号
2秒前
4秒前
成就小蘑菇完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
无心的钢笔完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
7秒前
7秒前
所所应助大方的不愁采纳,获得10
8秒前
GingerF举报神奇CiCi求助涉嫌违规
8秒前
丿丶恒发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
bailubailing发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
12秒前
12秒前
英勇的犀牛完成签到 ,获得积分20
13秒前
ZhuZiqi发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
科目三应助皮鲂采纳,获得10
13秒前
清一完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
GingerF给神奇CiCi的求助进行了留言
15秒前
GGBond完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
葛力完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
田様应助y容采纳,获得10
17秒前
李二狗发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
科研通AI2S应助jxcandice采纳,获得30
18秒前
billevans完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
小马甲应助bailubailing采纳,获得10
19秒前
欧皇完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
25秒前
25秒前
26秒前
七海完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
Total完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
江南之南完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
chenhui完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
俭朴雁卉发布了新的文献求助30
29秒前
30秒前
lmplzzp发布了新的文献求助30
32秒前
云霓发布了新的文献求助30
32秒前
学术圈边缘派遣员完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
脑电大模型与情感脑机接口研究--郑伟龙 500
GMP in Practice: Regulatory Expectations for the Pharmaceutical Industry 500
简明药物化学习题答案 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6298932
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8115938
关于积分的说明 16990631
捐赠科研通 5360188
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2847581
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1825035
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1679340