石墨烯
拉曼光谱
表面改性
原位
纳米技术
材料科学
光谱学
化学
物理
光学
物理化学
有机化学
量子力学
作者
Philipp Vecera,Julio C. Chacón‐Torres,Thomas Pichler,Stephanie Reich,Himadri R. Soni,Andreas Görling,Konstantin F. Edelthalhammer,Herwig Peterlik,Frank Hauke,Andreas Hirsch
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-34281-x
摘要
The authors have retracted this article because of data processing errors that impacted data presentation and interpretation of the Raman spectra plotted in Fig. 1c, Fig. 2b, and Fig. S2, which invalidate the conclusions of the article.The authors state that the data processing was performed with a routine implemented in the OriginPro® software.The evolution of the Raman spectra upon exposure to an electrophilic trapping reagent (H 2 0 vapour, H 2 , O 2 ) was displayed as cumulative plots, whereby individual spectra are added up consecutively and displayed in a 'waterfall' presentation.Upon reexamination of the data, the authors found that the C z mode, characteristic of graphitic intercalation, vanishes with the continuous exposure of the electrophilic trapping reagent, whereas in the original Fig. 1c, Fig. S2 it is widely retained, and in some series it becomes more intense.The apparent persistence of the C z mode is a direct consequence of the erroneous data processing.Any conclusions on the structure of the intercalated graphite during gas exposure that were drawn from the analysis of the C z mode are invalid.Especially, pathway i) in Fig. 2a of the paper is not supported by the measured data.Furthermore, the authors found that the spectra displayed in Fig. 1d, Fig. 2b (grey line) and Fig. 4b are identical, although they are described as different data sets, invalidating the analysis of the D bands.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI