医学
应力断裂
骨矿物
置信区间
相对风险
流离失所(心理学)
地面反作用力
物理疗法
内科学
运动学
骨质疏松症
心理学
心理治疗师
物理
经典力学
作者
Mikel R. Joachim,Stephanie Kliethermes,Bryan C. Heiderscheit
标识
DOI:10.2519/jospt.2023.11860
摘要
OBJECTIVES: To (1) assess relationships between running biomechanics, bone health, and bone stress injuries (BSIs), and (2) determine which variables constitute the most parsimonious BSI risk model among collegiate cross-country runners. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. METHODS: Running gait and bone mineral density (BMD) data from healthy collegiate cross-country runners were collected at preseason over 6 seasons. A generalized estimating equation model with backward selection was used to develop the most parsimonious model for estimating BSI risk, controlling for sex, running speed, and prior BSI. The variables assessed were spatiotemporal, ground reaction force, and joint kinematics, based on previous literature. Quasi-likelihood under the independence model criterion values and R2 values were used to select the best-fitting model. RESULTS: Data from 103 runners were included in the analysis. The best-fitting model included vertical center of mass (COM) displacement and BMD z-score. Injury risk increased with greater vertical COM displacement (unit = 0.5 cm; relative risk [RR] = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.29; P = .04) and decreased with greater BMD z-score (unit = 0.5; RR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.95; P = .007). The model performed similarly when step rate was included instead of vertical COM displacement. CONCLUSION: Vertical COM displacement and BMD z-score contributed to the best model for estimating risk the risk of bone stress injury in cross-country runners. Step rate was also an important variable for assessing injury risk. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):761-768. Epub 20 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11860
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI