[Comparison of diagnostic performance of Clear Cell Likelihood Score v1.0 and v2.0 for clear renal cell carcinoma].

接收机工作特性 医学 卡帕 逻辑回归 肾透明细胞癌 肾细胞癌 科恩卡帕 核医学 放射科 内科学 统计 数学 几何学
作者
Yuantao Hao,Shan Gao,Xiang Zhang,Manman Cui,Xiaohui Ding,H Wang,Dong Yan,Haitao Ye,H Wang
出处
期刊:PubMed 卷期号:43 (5): 800-806
标识
DOI:10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2023.05.16
摘要

To compare the performance of Clear Cell Likelihood Score (ccLS) v1.0 and v2.0 in diagnosing clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from small renal masses (SRM).We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and MR images of patients with pathologically confirmed solid SRM from the First Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021, and from Beijing Friendship Hospital of Capital Medical University and Peking University First Hospital between January 1, 2019 and May 17, 2021. Six abdominal radiologists were trained for use of the ccLS algorithm and scored independently using ccLS v1.0 and ccLS v2.0. Random- effects logistic regression modeling was used to generate plot receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ccLS v1.0 and ccLS v2.0 for ccRCC, and the area under curve (AUC) of these two scoring systems were compared using the DeLong's test. Weighted Kappa test was used to evaluate the interobserver agreement of the ccLS score, and differences in the weighted Kappa coefficients was compared using the Gwet consistency coefficient.In total, 691 patients (491 males, 200 females; mean age, 54 ± 12 years) with 700 renal masses were included in this study. The pooled accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of ccLS v1.0 for diagnosing ccRCC were 77.1%, 76.8%, 77.7%, 90.2%, and 55.7%, as compared with 80.9%, 79.3%, 85.1%, 93.4%, 60.6% with ccLS v2.0, respectively. The AUC of ccLS v2.0 was significantly higher than that of ccLS v1.0 for diagnosis of ccRCC (0.897 vs 0.859; P < 0.01). The interobserver agreement did not differ significantly between ccLS v1.0 and ccLS v2.0 (0.56 vs 0.60; P > 0.05).ccLS v2.0 has better performance for diagnosing ccRCC than ccLS v1.0 and can be considered for use to assist radiologists with their routine diagnostic tasks.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
夜话风陵杜完成签到 ,获得积分0
刚刚
幼荷完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
Chang完成签到 ,获得积分0
2秒前
kk完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
nanxing发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
tinydog完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
zdu完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
jhcraul完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
xiaofenzi完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
马大翔完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
LingYun完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
keke发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
時雨完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
杨天天完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
105完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
11完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
大卫在分享完成签到,获得积分0
17秒前
foxdaopo完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
轩辕德地完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
DD立芬完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
zxinyi完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
可爱的函函应助nanxing采纳,获得10
31秒前
凯蒂晗晗关注了科研通微信公众号
34秒前
涨芝士完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
天天快乐应助虚幻代桃采纳,获得10
37秒前
38秒前
小小邹完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
朱奕韬发布了新的文献求助10
43秒前
科研狗的春天完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
aaronzhu1995完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
向日葵完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
支雨泽完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
dreamon完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
研友_n0kjPL完成签到,获得积分0
49秒前
糊涂的青烟完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
我不会乱起名字的完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
orixero应助Ji采纳,获得10
53秒前
搬砖的化学男完成签到 ,获得积分0
53秒前
ovood完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
叶剑英与华南分局档案史料 500
Foreign Policy of the French Second Empire: A Bibliography 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3146916
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2798176
关于积分的说明 7826854
捐赠科研通 2454756
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1306446
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627788
版权声明 601565