Is MRI Better than CT for the LI-RADS?

HomeRadiologyVol. 307, No. 1 PreviousNext Reviews and CommentaryEditorialIs MRI Better than CT for the LI-RADS?Maxime Ronot Maxime Ronot Author AffiliationsFrom the Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon (Université de Paris), 100 Blvd du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France.Address correspondence to the author (email: [email protected]).Maxime Ronot Published Online:Jan 10 2023https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.222755MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References1. American College of Radiology. CT/MRI Liver imaging reporting and data system v2018 core. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/LI-RADS/LI-RADS-2018-Core.pdf. Accessed November 3, 2022. Google Scholar2. van der Pol CB, Lim CS, Sirlin CB, et al. Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Overall Malignancy: A Systematic Review. Gastroenterology 2019;156(4):976–986. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3. Lee S, Kim YY, Shin J, et al. Percentages of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in LI-RADS Categories with CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2023;307(1):e.220646. Google Scholar4. van der Pol CB, McInnes MDF, Salameh JP, et alLI-RADS IPD Group Collaborators. Impact of Reference Standard on CT, MRI, and Contrast-enhanced US LI-RADS Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2022;303(3):544–545. Link, Google Scholar5. Rimola J, Sapena V, Brancatelli G, et al. Reliability of extracellular contrast versus gadoxetic acid in assessing small liver lesions using liver imaging reporting and data system v.2018 and European association for the study of the liver criteria. Hepatology 2022;76(5):1318–1328. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6. Chernyak V, Tang A, Do RKG, et aland the LI-RADS. Steering Committee and Guarantors of translation integrity listed in the Acknowledgements. Liver imaging: it is time to adopt standardized terminology. Eur Radiol 2022;32(9):6291–6301. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived: Oct 26 2022Revision requested: Nov 3 2022Revision received: Nov 3 2022Accepted: Nov 8 2022Published online: Jan 10 2023 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsAccompanying This ArticlePercentages of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in LI-RADS Categories with CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisJan 10 2023RadiologyRecommended Articles RSNA Education Exhibits RSNA Case Collection Vol. 307, No. 1 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download