Is there a weekend effect in obstetrics?

产科 周末效应 计算机科学 数据科学 医学 护理部
作者
Jonathan M. Snowden,Aaron B. Caughey
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.h6192
摘要

Recent research published in The BMJ and elsewhere brings renewed attention to the “weekend effect,” suggesting higher rates of adverse outcomes associated with hospital admissions and procedures performed at weekends than on weekdays. Findings are not uniform among studies and fields of medicine, and persistent questions remain about whether significant findings reflect differences in case mix severity during the weekend or staffing and volume factors that are likely to influence outcomes among the patients at highest risk. The weekend effect is particularly under-studied in obstetrics, with decidedly mixed results from the small number of studies. A study by Palmer and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj.h5774) helps to fill this evidence gap, presenting a thoughtful analysis of adverse birth outcomes in a retrospective cohort from the United Kingdom. This study found that some adverse outcomes were slightly but significantly more common among weekend deliveries, most notably perinatal mortality. Although the magnitude was small (an unadjusted absolute increase of 0.9 deaths per 1000 deliveries (0.73% v 0.64%); adjusted odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.13), the gravity of this outcome demands our attention. Despite some notable examples of null findings, enough evidence now exists for us to reasonably suspect that out of hours deliveries are at higher risk for adverse outcomes. The evidence for higher risks among night time deliveries is even stronger.However, additional well designed studies are needed to determine whether these findings are robust within and across populations. In particular, although Palmer and colleagues controlled for patients’ characteristics in regression models, more work should examine potential differences in case mix between weekend and weekday deliveries. 14 Observational data are often the best available option to study this topic, but every effort should be made to rule out uncontrolled confounding. These authors are to be commended for analyzing multiple quality metrics (for example, puerperal and neonatal infections, birth trauma), and the concordance of several of these findings lends credibility to results. Given ongoing debate about the most appropriate quality metrics, 16 future studies should analyze currently accepted metrics, even as we continue to refine definitions. In particular, calls have been made for researchers to stop using severe perineal lacerations as a quality metric in obstetrics. Even in the most rigorous studies, the most likely mechanism underlying the weekend effect is systems factors (for example, staffing, resource availability, hospital policies). Such factors are specific to a healthcare system, and even to a hospital. Therefore, finding evidence of an effect in one population does not guarantee that the association will persist in others or even within a single population over time. This heterogeneity of effect complicates research but also offers important opportunities to identify levers with potential to improve outcomes for women and babies. The weekend effect in obstetrics fits within the broad concept of “capacity strain” in healthcare systems—the process bywhich performance of a clinical unit can deteriorate above a certain threshold of patient volume, complexity (acuity), or both. 18 Given the decreased levels of staffing and availability of resources that characterize most hospitals at the weekend, a lower threshold above which capacity strain threatens patients’ outcomes is likely. Evidence is emerging that other factors related to capacity strain such as busy days, holidays, and doctors’ absence at conferences affect patients’ outcomes, in addition to weekend effects. 19 20 More research is needed in obstetrics to explore capacity strain: how to define and measure it, which obstetric outcomes are sensitive to it, and when. Most importantly, when a capacity strain effect is found, we must identify effective strategies to safeguard maternal and infant outcomes during such vulnerable times. Factors that may help to mitigate the weekend effect and other forms of capacity strain in obstetric units include specific staffing models, such as the obstetric hospitalist model and other flexible models of care, and hospital policies including condition specific protocols. Unfortunately, several recent studies, including this one, have found no association between outcomes and staffing or use of protocols. 23 Still, we must continue to explore the factors that differentiate obstetric units from one another, analyze how and when adverse outcomes “out of hours” are associated with these factors, and apply the findings to clinical practice and hospital policy.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
mmmmmMM完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
luckweb完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
猫的毛完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
nicky完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
麦子完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
Wilson完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
luckweb发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
15秒前
18秒前
传奇3应助wujiwuhui采纳,获得10
20秒前
开心寄松完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
北宫完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
wansida完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
QXS完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
27秒前
菠萝完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
领导范儿应助Villanellel采纳,获得10
31秒前
wintersss完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
尹尹发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
zzzzzz完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
坦率的枕头完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
XS_QI完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
与共发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
苑阿宇完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
yck1027完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
fatcat完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
斯文败类应助Camus采纳,获得10
43秒前
45秒前
Tammy完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
Herisland完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
lulalula完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
NEO完成签到 ,获得积分10
50秒前
zcydbttj2011完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
温暖的小鸭子完成签到,获得积分10
54秒前
58秒前
王泽厚发布了新的文献求助20
59秒前
雪花发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038066
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575779
关于积分的说明 11373801
捐赠科研通 3305584
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819239
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892655
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022