医学
前列腺切除术
前列腺癌
中期分析
随机对照试验
临床终点
不利影响
前列腺特异性抗原
放射治疗
外科
癌症
泌尿科
内科学
前列腺
危险系数
置信区间
作者
M. Bolla,Hendrik Van Poppel,Bertrand Tombal,K. Vekemans,L. Da Pozzo,Theo M. de Reijke,A. Verbaeys,Jean-François Bosset,Roland van Velthoven,Marc Colombel,Cornelieke van de Beek,Paul C.M.S. Verhagen,Alphonsus van den Bergh,Cora N. Sternberg,Thomas Gasser,Geertjan van Tienhoven,Pierre Scalliet,Karin Haustermans,Laurence Collette
出处
期刊:The Lancet
[Elsevier]
日期:2012-12-01
卷期号:380 (9858): 2018-2027
被引量:785
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61253-7
摘要
Background We report the long-term results of a trial of immediate postoperative irradiation versus a wait-and-see policy in patients with prostate cancer extending beyond the prostate, to confirm whether previously reported progression-free survival was sustained. Methods This randomised, phase 3, controlled trial recruited patients aged 75 years or younger with untreated cT0–3 prostate cancer (WHO performance status 0 or 1) from 37 institutions across Europe. Eligible patients were randomly assigned centrally (1:1) to postoperative irradiation (60 Gy of conventional irradiation to the surgical bed for 6 weeks) or to a wait-and-see policy until biochemical progression (increase in prostate-specific antigen >0·2 μg/L confirmed twice at least 2 weeks apart). We analysed the primary endpoint, biochemical progression-free survival, by intention to treat (two-sided test for difference at α=0.05, adjusted for one interim analysis) and did exploratory analyses of heterogeneity of effect. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00002511. Findings 1005 patients were randomly assigned to a wait-and-see policy (n=503) or postoperative irradiation (n=502) and were followed up for a median of 10·6 years (range 2 months to 16·6 years). Postoperative irradiation significantly improved biochemical progression-free survival compared with the wait-and-see policy (198 [39·4%] of 502 patients in postoperative irradiation group vs 311 [61·8%] of 503 patients in wait-and-see group had biochemical or clinical progression or died; HR 0·49 [95% CI 0·41–0·59]; p<0·0001). Late adverse effects (any type of any grade) were more frequent in the postoperative irradiation group than in the wait-and-see group (10 year cumulative incidence 70·8% [66·6–75·0] vs 59·7% [55·3–64·1]; p=0.001). Interpretation Results at median follow-up of 10·6 years show that conventional postoperative irradiation significantly improves biochemical progression-free survival and local control compared with a wait-and-see policy, supporting results at 5 year follow-up; however, improvements in clinical progression-free survival were not maintained. Exploratory analyses suggest that postoperative irradiation might improve clinical progression-free survival in patients younger than 70 years and in those with positive surgical margins, but could have a detrimental effect in patients aged 70 years or older. Funding Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Comité de l'Isère, Grenoble, France) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Charitable Trust.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI