作者
Hisham Mehanna,Davy Rapozo,Sandra Ventorin von Zeidler,Kevin J. Harrington,Stuart C Winter,A. Hartley,Paul Nankivell,Andrew Schache,Philip Sloan,Edward Odell,Selvam Thavaraj,Keith Hunter,Ketan Shah,Gareth J. Thomas,Anna Long,Rasoul Amel-Kashipaz,Rachel M. Brown,Brendan Conn,Gillian Hall,Paul M. Matthews,Justin Weir,Yoomi Yeo,Miranda Pring,Catharine M L West,James McCaul,Paweł Golusiński,Alice Sitch,Rachel Spruce,Nikolaos Batis,J. Bryant,Jill Brooks,Terence M. Jones,Francesca M. Buffa,Syed Haider,Max Robinson
摘要
Abstract Purpose: While there are several prognostic classifiers, to date, there are no validated predictive models that inform treatment selection for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our aim was to develop clinical and/or biomarker predictive models for patient outcome and treatment escalation for OPSCC. Experimental Design: We retrospectively collated clinical data and samples from a consecutive cohort of OPSCC cases treated with curative intent at ten secondary care centers in United Kingdom and Poland between 1999 and 2012. We constructed tissue microarrays, which were stained and scored for 10 biomarkers. We then undertook multivariable regression of eight clinical parameters and 10 biomarkers on a development cohort of 600 patients. Models were validated on an independent, retrospectively collected, 385-patient cohort. Results: A total of 985 subjects (median follow-up 5.03 years, range: 4.73–5.21 years) were included. The final biomarker classifier, comprising p16 and survivin immunohistochemistry, high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in situ hybridization, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, predicted benefit from combined surgery + adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy over primary chemoradiotherapy in the high-risk group [3-year overall survival (OS) 63.1% vs. 41.1%, respectively, HR = 0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16–0.65; P = 0.002], but not in the low-risk group (HR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.14–1.24; P = 0.114). On further adjustment by propensity scores, the adjusted HR in the high-risk group was 0.34, 95% CI = 0.17–0.67, P = 0.002, and in the low-risk group HR was 0.5, 95% CI = 0.1–2.38, P = 0.384. The concordance index was 0.73. Conclusions: We have developed a prognostic classifier, which also appears to demonstrate moderate predictive ability. External validation in a prospective setting is now underway to confirm this and prepare for clinical adoption.