Proximal occlusion of unaffected internal iliac artery versus distal occlusion of aneurysmatic internal iliac artery prior to EVAR: a comparative evaluation of efficacy and clinical outcome

Occlusion of the internal iliac artery (IIA) may be necessary prior to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to prevent endoleak Type II. We compared efficacy and clinical outcome after proximal occlusion of an unaffected IIA (ProxEmbx) using an Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP) I vs distal occlusion of aneurysmatic IIA with coils and plugs (DistEmbx).Between 2009 and 2012, 22 patients underwent EVAR. In 9 patients with unaffected IIA, occlusion was performed by a single AVP. In 13 patients with aneurysmatic IIA, more distal embolization (DistEmbX) was conducted by using several coils and additional AVPs. Retrospectively, technical success, clinical outcome and complications were evaluated.Embolization of the IIA was successful in all patients. Three patients with more DistEmbX of aneurysmatic IIAs suffered from new onset of sexual dysfunction after occlusion without statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). Transient buttock claudication was observed in three patients in each group. Bowel ischaemia did not occur. The procedure time (p = 0.013) and fluoroscopy time (p = 0.038) was significantly lower in the ProxEmbx group than in the DistEmbx group.Proximal occlusion of an unaffected IIA and more distal occlusion of an aneurysmatic IIA prior to EVAR had the same technical and clinical outcome. However, proximal plug embolization of an unaffected IIA prior to EVAR was associated with shorter procedure and fluoroscopy time in comparison with more DistEmbX of aneurysmatic IIAs. Advances in knowledge: Proximal embolization of unaffected IIA and DistEmbX of aneurysmatic IIA before EVAR are both effective in preventing Type II endoleaks and have the same technical and clinical outcome.