化学
色谱法
质谱法
气相色谱/串联质谱法
检出限
农药残留
串联质谱法
气相色谱法
气相色谱-质谱法
杀虫剂
飞行时间质谱
农学
生物
离子
有机化学
电离
作者
Xinyue Cao,Guo‐Fang Pang,Linghe Jin,Jian Kang,Xueyan Hu,Qiaoying Chang,Minglin Wang,Chun‐Lin Fan
出处
期刊:Sepu
[China Science Publishing & Media Ltd.]
日期:2015-01-01
卷期号:33 (4): 389-389
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.3724/sp.j.1123.2014.12026
摘要
The performances of gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) and gas chromatography quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry (GC-QTOF/MS) for the determination of 208 pesticide residues in fruit and vegetable samples, including apple, orange, tomato and cucumber, were compared comprehensively. Based on the differences of the two instruments, their respective characteristics and scopes of application in the detection of the pesticide residues were presented, which provided the reference for the analysis of pesticide residues. The performance parameters of the two instruments, such as overall recoveries, precisions, limits of detection, linear ranges, identification points and matrix effects, were evaluated according to a designed experiment. At three spiked levels (5.0, 10.0 and 20.0 µg/kg), the average recoveries for the majority of pesticides (93.0%) ranged from 70% to 120% in the four matrices with relative standard deviations below 20%. The limits of detection for most of the pesticides by GC-MS/MS and GC-Q-TOF/MS were less than 5.0 µg/kg. Compared with GC-QTOF/MS, GC-MS/MS showed relatively lower limits of detection and wider linear ranges, and its performance was more satisfactory in accurate quantitative analysis due to its superior sensitivity. On the other hand, GC-QTOF/MS provided accurate mass measurement, which was proved to be an efficient analytical tool on the rapid screening and confirmation of a large number of pesticides and non-target compounds.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI