冲动性
心理学
比例(比率)
增量有效性
样品(材料)
数据收集
标准效度
测试有效性
心理测量学
社会心理学
应用心理学
临床心理学
结构效度
统计
数学
物理
化学
量子力学
色谱法
作者
Morgan N. McCredie,Bethany Harris,Timothy Regan,Leslie C. Morey,Sherecce Fields
标识
DOI:10.1080/00223891.2020.1866588
摘要
Two of the most widely used self-report measures of impulsivity are the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale and its shortened version, the SUPPS-P, which currently are limited by their inability to detect careless and/or random responding. The present study develops and cross-validates an inconsistency scale for use with the UPPS-P and SUPPS-P in order to accurately screen for data quality and better detect invalid responding. A total of 443 participants were recruited from Amazon’s MTurk online data collection service to serve as the derivation sample and 231 undergraduates were recruited to serve as the cross-validation sample. The inconsistency scale demonstrated good classification accuracy in differentiating between genuine and random protocols and moderated the relationships between the UPPS-P/SUPPS-P and a criterion measure of impulsivity, the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11). Thus, the inconsistency scale shows promise as an indicator of variable response inconsistency for use with both the UPPS-P and SUPPS-P in community and undergraduate research samples.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI