Addressing the need for standardization of test methods for self-healing concrete: an inter-laboratory study on concrete with macrocapsules

标准化 自愈 考试(生物学) 工程类 建筑工程 计算机科学 法律工程学 医学 地质学 古生物学 操作系统 替代医学 病理
作者
Tim Van Mullem,Giovanni Anglani,Marta Dudek,Hanne Vanoutrive,Ģirts Būmanis,Chrysoula Litina,Arkadiusz Kwiecień,Abir Al‐Tabbaa,Diāna Bajāre,Teresa Stryszewska,Robby Caspeele,Kim Van Tittelboom,Jean‐Marc Tulliani,Elke Gruyaert,Paola Antonaci,Nele De Belie
出处
期刊:Science and Technology of Advanced Materials [Informa]
卷期号:21 (1): 661-682 被引量:61
标识
DOI:10.1080/14686996.2020.1814117
摘要

Development and commercialization of self-healing concrete is hampered due to a lack of standardized test methods. Six inter-laboratory testing programs are being executed by the EU COST action SARCOS, each focusing on test methods for a specific self-healing technique. This paper reports on the comparison of tests for mortar and concrete specimens with polyurethane encapsulated in glass macrocapsules. First, the pre-cracking method was analysed: mortar specimens were cracked in a three-point bending test followed by an active crack width control technique to restrain the crack width up to a predefined value, while the concrete specimens were cracked in a three-point bending setup with a displacement-controlled loading system. Microscopic measurements showed that with the application of the active control technique almost all crack widths were within a narrow predefined range. Conversely, for the concrete specimens the variation on the crack width was higher. After pre-cracking, the self-healing effect was characterized via durability tests: the mortar specimens were tested in a water permeability test and the spread of the healing agent on the crack surfaces was determined, while the concrete specimens were subjected to two capillary water absorption tests, executed with a different type of waterproofing applied on the zone around the crack. The quality of the waterproofing was found to be important, as different results were obtained in each absorption test. For the permeability test, 4 out of 6 labs obtained a comparable flow rate for the reference specimens, yet all 6 labs obtained comparable sealing efficiencies, highlighting the potential for further standardization.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
轻松的芯完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
乔乔发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助Janus采纳,获得10
2秒前
可可完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
vastom发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
脑洞疼应助风清扬采纳,获得10
4秒前
JamesPei应助柒柒的小熊采纳,获得30
4秒前
ljdpsy完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
SciGPT应助Anesthesialy采纳,获得10
5秒前
lele发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
欢喜谷波发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
ningg发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
吕敬瑶发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
大气的画板完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
科研通AI6.2应助小太阳采纳,获得30
9秒前
端庄的煎蛋完成签到,获得积分0
9秒前
852应助Miraitowa采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
LFL发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
科研通AI2S应助pdw采纳,获得30
13秒前
13秒前
jayliu发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
胡杨柳完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Seven发布了新的文献求助20
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
精致发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
英俊的铭应助大气的画板采纳,获得10
18秒前
cc发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
吕敬瑶完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
vivian发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
VASCULITIS(血管炎)Rheumatic Disease Clinics (Clinics Review Articles) —— 《风湿病临床》(临床综述文章) 1000
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5971712
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7288942
关于积分的说明 15992394
捐赠科研通 5109548
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2744066
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1709783
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1621760