软骨发生
软骨
间充质干细胞
外植体培养
胶原酶
细胞生物学
胰蛋白酶化
运行x2
体内
男科
分子生物学
化学
医学
病理
体外
生物
解剖
成骨细胞
胰蛋白酶
遗传学
生物化学
酶
作者
Elizabeth Vinod,Ganesh Parasuraman,Abel Livingston,Soosai Manickam Amirtham,Grace Rebekah,J Jeya Lisha,Alfred Job Daniel,Solomon Sathishkumar
标识
DOI:10.1080/03008207.2023.2202266
摘要
Resident articular stem cells isolated using a migratory assay called Migratory Chondroprogenitors (MCPs) have emerged as a promising cellular therapeutic for the treatment of cartilage pathologies. In-vivo studies using MCPs report their superiority over bone-marrow mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes for treating chondral defects. However, there is no consensus on their isolation protocol. This study aimed to compare four reported isolation methods of MCPs and identify the optimal and feasible protocol for future translational work.Human MCPs isolated from osteoarthritic cartilage (n = 3) were divided into four groups: a) MCP1: 8-15 mm cartilage explants, b) MCP2: 8-10 mm explants digested in 0.1% collagenase for 2 hrs. and cultured c) MCP3: 1 mm cartilage explants and d) MCP 4: 25 mm explants with a X tear, 7-day culture, and trypsinization to release migrated cells. The MCPs were subjected to the following analysis: growth kinetics, surface marker expression, mRNA gene expression for markers of chondrogenesis and hypertrophy, and trilineage differentiation.MCPs isolated via the four methods showed similar surface marker profiles, chondrogenic (SOX-9, ACAN, COL2A1) and hypertrophic (COL1, RUNX2) gene expression. The migration time for the MCP3 group was the longest. The MCP1, MCP2, and MCP4 groups produced MCPs with comparable cellular expansion feasibility.MCPs can be preferably isolated by the any of the three above methods based on the investigator's discretion. In the case of small cartilage samples similar to the MCP3 group, the isolation of MCP is plausible, keeping in mind the additional time required.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI