Feasibility Study of Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes to Screen Patients with Advanced Solid Cancers for Palliative Care Needs

医学 缓和医疗 实体瘤 家庭医学 重症监护医学 癌症 内科学 护理部
作者
Tara Kaufmann,Matthew D. Kearney,Dagoberto Cortez,John Saxton,Katie Goodfellow,Carolyn E. Smith,Patrick Chang,Katherine Sebastian,Aaron Galaznik,Julie Scott,Elizabeth Kvale,Arif H. Kamal,Antonia V. Bennett,Angela M. Stover,Ashley M. Henneghan,Michael Pignone,Gabrielle B. Rocque
出处
期刊:Journal of Palliative Medicine [Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.]
标识
DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0375
摘要

Background: Palliative care delivery in oncology is challenging and referral practices vary widely. Standardized, needs-based screening and triage systems are essential to more effectively address patients' palliative care needs. Objective: Assess the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness among patients with advanced solid cancers of using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) to screen for palliative care needs. Design: We developed a 13-item ePRO palliative care survey to assess multidimensional palliative care needs and conducted a pilot study (n = 25) of a palliative care screening intervention using ePRO monitoring and presentation of ePRO reports to a multidisciplinary care team. Feasibility was assessed through enrollment, retention, and ePRO adherence rates. Acceptability and appropriateness were evaluated through exit surveys of all participants and semistructured interviews of a subset of participants (n = 10). Results: From May 2022 to April 2023, 68% (25/37) of eligible patients consented and enrolled on the ePRO platform. Overall, 96% (22/23; 2 censored for death/hospice) of participants completed the study and 96% of participants met predefined ePRO adherence thresholds. Overall, 84% (21/25) of patients reported a severe response during the study period, of whom 95% (20/21) received supportive services during the study period. Patients found the ePRO palliative survey acceptable and appropriate. Qualitative interviews found patient-identified barriers to the intervention and areas for improvement. Conclusions: Screening patients for unmet palliative needs using ePRO monitoring is feasible, acceptable, and appropriate among patients, but more work is needed to understand the perspectives of diverse patients and how to integrate ePRO palliative care screening into clinical workflows.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
星辰大海应助Alex采纳,获得10
刚刚
张金鹏完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
1秒前
wanmiao12发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
欧耶耶发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
不知发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
奶昔发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
顶真发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
xszlll发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
Ava应助hhh采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
顾矜应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
xingxing应助科研通管家采纳,获得100
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
大个应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
4秒前
4秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
IEST-RP-CC018: Cleanroom Cleaning and Sanitization: Operating and Monitoring Procedures 600
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6527741
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8320805
关于积分的说明 17811834
捐赠科研通 5629329
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2930379
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1907110
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1766591