Feasibility Study of Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes to Screen Patients with Advanced Solid Cancers for Palliative Care Needs

医学 缓和医疗 实体瘤 家庭医学 重症监护医学 癌症 内科学 护理部
作者
Tara Kaufmann,Matthew D. Kearney,Dagoberto Cortez,John Saxton,Katie Goodfellow,Carolyn E. Smith,Patrick Chang,Katherine Sebastian,Aaron Galaznik,Julie Scott,Elizabeth Kvale,Arif H. Kamal,Antonia V. Bennett,Angela M. Stover,Ashley M. Henneghan,Michael Pignone,Gabrielle B. Rocque
出处
期刊:Journal of Palliative Medicine [Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.]
标识
DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0375
摘要

Background: Palliative care delivery in oncology is challenging and referral practices vary widely. Standardized, needs-based screening and triage systems are essential to more effectively address patients' palliative care needs. Objective: Assess the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness among patients with advanced solid cancers of using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) to screen for palliative care needs. Design: We developed a 13-item ePRO palliative care survey to assess multidimensional palliative care needs and conducted a pilot study (n = 25) of a palliative care screening intervention using ePRO monitoring and presentation of ePRO reports to a multidisciplinary care team. Feasibility was assessed through enrollment, retention, and ePRO adherence rates. Acceptability and appropriateness were evaluated through exit surveys of all participants and semistructured interviews of a subset of participants (n = 10). Results: From May 2022 to April 2023, 68% (25/37) of eligible patients consented and enrolled on the ePRO platform. Overall, 96% (22/23; 2 censored for death/hospice) of participants completed the study and 96% of participants met predefined ePRO adherence thresholds. Overall, 84% (21/25) of patients reported a severe response during the study period, of whom 95% (20/21) received supportive services during the study period. Patients found the ePRO palliative survey acceptable and appropriate. Qualitative interviews found patient-identified barriers to the intervention and areas for improvement. Conclusions: Screening patients for unmet palliative needs using ePRO monitoring is feasible, acceptable, and appropriate among patients, but more work is needed to understand the perspectives of diverse patients and how to integrate ePRO palliative care screening into clinical workflows.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
熊逍发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
怂怂发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科目三应助TomPeter采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研论文的狗完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
eagle14835完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
Crazydan完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
lozz发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
6秒前
厉害砖家发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
搜集达人应助死神采纳,获得10
7秒前
韶邑发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
明理的寒云完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
10秒前
暴躁的人英完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
亮倪力完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
yuan发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
云水完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
bkagyin应助厉害砖家采纳,获得10
16秒前
JY完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
molihuakai应助暴躁的人英采纳,获得10
18秒前
张欢馨应助悦yue采纳,获得10
19秒前
pollyLL完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
Jason发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
ayayaya完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
冷冷完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
Valley发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
1104481279应助怡然的冰旋采纳,获得10
21秒前
22秒前
我是老大应助wcw采纳,获得10
22秒前
吃饱就睡发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 1000
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
Green Fire Retardants for Polymeric Materials 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7615103
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9190415
关于积分的说明 19692033
捐赠科研通 7187658
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3271223
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2434530
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2266354