已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update

医学 系统回顾 指南 肾细胞癌 随机对照试验 循证医学 临床试验 医学物理学 内科学 梅德林 家庭医学 替代医学 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Börje Ljungberg,Laurence Albigès,Yasmin Abu‐Ghanem,Karim Bensalah,Saeed Dabestani,Sergio Fernandéz‐Pello,Rachel H. Giles,Fabian Hofmann,Milan Hora,Markus A. Kuczyk,Teele Kuusk,Thomas Lam,Lorenzo Marconi,Axel S. Merseburger,Thomas Powles,Michael Staehler,Rana Tahbaz,Alessandro Volpe,Axel Bex
出处
期刊:European Urology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:75 (5): 799-810 被引量:1171
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011
摘要

The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Guideline Panel has prepared evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for the management of RCC.To provide an updated RCC guideline based on standardised methodology including systematic reviews, which is robust, transparent, reproducible, and reliable.For the 2019 update, evidence synthesis was undertaken based on a comprehensive and structured literature assessment for new and relevant data. Where necessary, formal systematic reviews adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were undertaken. Relevant databases (Medline, Cochrane Libraries, trial registries, conference proceedings) were searched until June 2018, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective or controlled studies with a comparator arm, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Where relevant, risk of bias (RoB) assessment, and qualitative and quantitative syntheses of the evidence were performed. The remaining sections of the document were updated following a structured literature assessment. Clinical practice recommendations were developed and issued based on the modified GRADE framework.All chapters of the RCC guidelines were updated based on a structured literature assessment, for prioritised topics based on the availability of robust data. For RCTs, RoB was low across studies. For most non-RCTs, clinical and methodological heterogeneity prevented pooling of data. The majority of included studies were retrospective with matched or unmatched cohorts, based on single- or multi-institutional data or national registries. The exception was for the treatment of metastatic RCC, for which there were several large RCTs, resulting in recommendations based on higher levels of evidence.The 2019 RCC guidelines have been updated by the multidisciplinary panel using the highest methodological standards. These guidelines provide the most reliable contemporary evidence base for the management of RCC in 2019.The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma Guideline Panel has thoroughly evaluated the available research data on kidney cancer to establish international standards for the care of kidney cancer patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Xiaoyuan发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
llnysl完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
寒冷天亦发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
hh发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
勤奋的饼干完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
栀虞完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
坚定的泥猴桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
13秒前
单薄怜寒完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
栀虞发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
权箴完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
思源应助Yuu采纳,获得10
17秒前
19秒前
yydtly发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
鹏程万里发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
香蕉觅云应助ikea1984采纳,获得10
22秒前
雨山发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
jack1511发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
景__完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
lee发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
32秒前
安静的花卷完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
BYN完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
37秒前
不加香菜完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
40秒前
yydtly完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
华仔应助研友_宋文昊采纳,获得30
47秒前
Alger完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
50秒前
CHENCEN完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
55秒前
56秒前
ZMX完成签到,获得积分10
59秒前
万能图书馆应助sny采纳,获得10
59秒前
1分钟前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
Distinct Aggregation Behaviors and Rheological Responses of Two Terminally Functionalized Polyisoprenes with Different Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding Motifs 450
Ciprofol versus propofol for adult sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3671119
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3228030
关于积分的说明 9778011
捐赠科研通 2938277
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1609784
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 760461
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 735962