DNA提取
三唑
DNA
生物
维管菌
微生物学
细菌
分子生物学
萃取(化学)
链球菌
色谱法
RNA提取
聚合酶链反应
化学
基因
核糖核酸
遗传学
作者
Ali S. Cheema,Lisa F. Stinson,Ching Tat Lai,Donna T. Geddes,Matt Payne
摘要
To evaluate four DNA extraction methods to elucidate the most effective method for bacterial DNA recovery from human milk (HM). Human milk DNA was extracted using the following methods: (i) Qiagen MagAttract Microbial DNA Isolation Kit (kit QM), (ii) Norgen Milk Bacterial DNA Isolation Kit (kit NM), (iii) Qiagen MagAttract Microbiome DNA/RNA Isolation Kit (kit MM) and (iv) TRIzol LS Reagent (method LS). The full‐length 16S rRNA gene was sequenced. Kits MM and method LS were unable to extract detectable levels of DNA in 9/11 samples. Detectable levels of DNA were recovered from all samples using kits NM (mean = 0·68 ng μl−1) and QM (mean = 0·55 ng μl−1). For kits NM and QM, the greatest number of reads were associated with Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus vestibularis, Propionibacterium acnes, Veillonella dispar and Rothia mucilaginosa. Contamination profiles varied substantially between kits, with one bacterial species detected in negative extraction controls generated with kit QM and six with kit NM. Kit QM is the most suitable of the kits tested for the extraction of bacterial DNA from human milk. Choice of extraction method impacts the efficiency of bacterial DNA extraction from human milk and the resultant bacterial community profiles generated from these samples.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI