Mathematical model of the artificial muscle with two actuators

Characteristic construction of cable-suspended parallel robot of artificial muscle, which presents an artificial forearm, is analyzed and synthesized. Novel results were achieved and presented. Results presented in this paper were initially driven to recognize and mathematically define undefined geometric relations of the artificial forearm since it was found that they strongly affect the dynamic response of this system. It gets more complicated when one has more complex system, which uses more artificial muscle subsystems, since these subsystems couple and system becomes more unstable. Unmodeled or insufficiently modeled dynamics can strongly affect the system’s instability. Because of that, the construction of this system and its new mathematical model are defined and presented in this paper. Generally, it can be said that the analysis of geometry of selected mechanism is the first step and very important step to establish the structural stability of these systems. This system is driven with two actuators, which need to work in a coordinated fashion. The aim of this paper is to show the importance of the geometry of this solution, which then strongly affects the system’s kinematics and dynamics. To determine the complexity of this system, it was presumed that system has rigid cables. Idea is to show the importance of good defined geometry of the system, which gives good basis for the definition of mathematical model of the system. Novel program package AMCO, artificial muscle contribution, was defined for the validation of the mathematical model of the system and for choice of its parameters. Sensitivity of the system to certain parameters is very high and hence analysis of this system needs to be done with a lot of caution. Some parameters are very influential on the possible implementation of the given task of the system. Only after choosing the parameters and checking the system through certain simulation results, control structure can be defined. In this paper, proportional–derivative controller was chosen.