A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy

医学 内镜超声 置信区间 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 细针穿刺 相对风险 放射科 活检 超声波 科克伦图书馆 不利影响 外科 核医学 内科学
作者
Zhi‐Wang Li,Wei Liu,Xiaoda Xu,Peiyu Li
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:56 (8): 668-678 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1097/mcg.0000000000001702
摘要

Background: The superiority between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is still a debate. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the diagnostic value and safety of these 2 needles in sampling of all solid lesions and separately pancreatic lesions. Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were searched for randomized controlled studies that reported the comparison of FNA and FNB in solid mass. Outcome measures included diagnostic accuracy, number of needle passes, diagnostic adequacy, presence of tissue cores, and adverse events. Standard error, upper and lower confidence intervals at 95% confidence interval for the risk were obtained using Review Manager Version 5.3 which was also used to generate forest plots for pooled analysis. The random or fixed effect model was applied depending on the heterogeneity ( I 2 ). Results: Eighteen randomized control trial studies with a total of 2718 patients (1141 patients with EUS-FNA, 1108 with EUS-FNB, and remaining 469 patients were sampled with both needles alternatively) were included in the meta-analysis. FNB group has relatively good diagnostic accuracy relative risk (RR): 0.94, 0.92-0.97; P =0.0002), diagnostic adequacy (RR: 0.95, 0.9-1.0; P =0.04) and high quality histologic yield compared (RR: 0.77, 0.64-0.93; P =0.007) with the FNA group in solid gastrointestinal lesions, and the number of needle passes to obtain sufficient tissue (mean difference: 0.54, 0.45-0.64; P <0.00001) was lower in the FNB group. For solid pancreatic disease only, there was no difference in diagnostic accuracy (RR: 0.97, 0.93-1.01, P =0.13) or quality histologic yield (RR: 0.60, 0.29-1.23; P =0.16). The rate of adverse events (RR: 1.04, 0.48-2.29; P =0.92) did not significantly differ between FNA and FNB groups. Conclusions: In solid gastrointestinal lesions, FNB is associated with a relatively better diagnostic adequacy, diagnostic adequacy and tissue cores rates, and less number of needle passes. For solid pancreatic disease only, there is no difference in diagnostic accuracy or tissue cores rates.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
jenny完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
祁乐安完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
naiyouqiu1989完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zjhzslq发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
baoxiaozhai完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
fy完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
强公子完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
12秒前
song完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
怡然小蚂蚁完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
小橙子完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
SciGPT应助滴答采纳,获得10
15秒前
大气白翠完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
确幸完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
zjhzslq完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
xdc发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
ommphey完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
牛哥还是强啊完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
科研通AI2S应助屈岂愈采纳,获得10
19秒前
好名字完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
kongzhiqiqi完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
滴答完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
浅浅殇完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
28秒前
滴答发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
高高的天亦完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
星空完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
文艺的青旋完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
青黛完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
大橙子发布了新的文献求助10
44秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
45秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
明钟达完成签到 ,获得积分10
57秒前
byyyy完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高高的哈密瓜完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Rondab应助橙汁采纳,获得10
1分钟前
读书的时候完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
颜云尔完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
孤独雨梅完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038128
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575831
关于积分的说明 11373827
捐赠科研通 3305610
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819255
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892655
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022