A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy

医学 内镜超声 置信区间 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 细针穿刺 相对风险 放射科 活检 超声波 科克伦图书馆 不利影响 外科 核医学 内科学
作者
Zhi‐Wang Li,Wei Liu,Xiaoda Xu,Peiyu Li
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:56 (8): 668-678 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1097/mcg.0000000000001702
摘要

Background: The superiority between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is still a debate. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the diagnostic value and safety of these 2 needles in sampling of all solid lesions and separately pancreatic lesions. Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were searched for randomized controlled studies that reported the comparison of FNA and FNB in solid mass. Outcome measures included diagnostic accuracy, number of needle passes, diagnostic adequacy, presence of tissue cores, and adverse events. Standard error, upper and lower confidence intervals at 95% confidence interval for the risk were obtained using Review Manager Version 5.3 which was also used to generate forest plots for pooled analysis. The random or fixed effect model was applied depending on the heterogeneity ( I 2 ). Results: Eighteen randomized control trial studies with a total of 2718 patients (1141 patients with EUS-FNA, 1108 with EUS-FNB, and remaining 469 patients were sampled with both needles alternatively) were included in the meta-analysis. FNB group has relatively good diagnostic accuracy relative risk (RR): 0.94, 0.92-0.97; P =0.0002), diagnostic adequacy (RR: 0.95, 0.9-1.0; P =0.04) and high quality histologic yield compared (RR: 0.77, 0.64-0.93; P =0.007) with the FNA group in solid gastrointestinal lesions, and the number of needle passes to obtain sufficient tissue (mean difference: 0.54, 0.45-0.64; P <0.00001) was lower in the FNB group. For solid pancreatic disease only, there was no difference in diagnostic accuracy (RR: 0.97, 0.93-1.01, P =0.13) or quality histologic yield (RR: 0.60, 0.29-1.23; P =0.16). The rate of adverse events (RR: 1.04, 0.48-2.29; P =0.92) did not significantly differ between FNA and FNB groups. Conclusions: In solid gastrointestinal lesions, FNB is associated with a relatively better diagnostic adequacy, diagnostic adequacy and tissue cores rates, and less number of needle passes. For solid pancreatic disease only, there is no difference in diagnostic accuracy or tissue cores rates.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Yuuuuu发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
Lin应助棒棒冰采纳,获得10
1秒前
科目三应助一一采纳,获得10
1秒前
keock发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
天天向上的小熊猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
junjun发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
Hexagram发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
温暖冰珍发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
哈哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
白白完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
miao发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
jiaxingsun发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
xyy001发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
pearlwh1227完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
耀阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
StandardR完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
俊逸飞雪发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
隐形曼青应助MAGICALEYE采纳,获得10
8秒前
sun发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
小二郎应助令狐擎宇采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
4ure完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
马外奥发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
乖猫要努力应助Pluto0o采纳,获得20
10秒前
白白发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
mouxq完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 500
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 400
北师大毕业论文 基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 390
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4023306
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3563350
关于积分的说明 11342113
捐赠科研通 3294890
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1814795
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 889504
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 812964