Too Much of a Good Thing: Who We Follow, What We Do, And How Much Time We Spend on Social Media Affects Well-Being

孤独 心理学 限制 社会化媒体 焦虑 萧条(经济学) 社会心理学 社交焦虑 临床心理学 发展心理学 精神科 宏观经济学 法学 经济 工程类 机械工程 政治学
作者
Melissa G. Hunt,Katherine All,Brennan Burns,Kyler Li
出处
期刊:Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology [Guilford Publications]
卷期号:40 (1): 46-68 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1521/jscp.2021.40.1.46
摘要

Introduction: Given previous experimental research on the benefits of limiting time spent on social media and correlational research linking active use to better well-being, we designed an experimental study to investigate the effects of limiting time and increasing active use on social media on well-being. Method: After completing a survey on who they followed on social media and undergoing a week of baseline monitoring, 88 undergraduates at a private university were randomly assigned to either limit Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Snapchat use to 30 minutes in total per day and increase their active use, just limit their use to 30 minutes per day, or continue to use social media as usual for three weeks. Results: The initial survey revealed that following more friends was negatively correlated with loneliness whereas following more strangers was positively correlated with depression. Highly depressed participants in the limited use group showed significant reductions in depression compared to the control group, but the active group did not show similar benefits. Highly active participants in the active group reported greater loneliness and anxiety and lower self-esteem at week 4 compared to less active participants in the active group, whereas the most passive participants in the control group showed the worst depression overall. Discussion: Our findings suggest that following friends rather than strangers and limiting time spent on social media may lead to significant improvements in well-being, and that moderately active engagement may be the most adaptive.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
烟花应助鹿初蓝采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
Akim应助魁梧的雨双采纳,获得10
1秒前
我是老大应助mjk2622采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
6秒前
11秒前
11秒前
充电宝应助i羽翼深蓝i采纳,获得10
12秒前
李东东完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
wdlc完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
16秒前
Yiyyan完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
20秒前
21秒前
兰格格完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
小白发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
所所应助nano采纳,获得10
27秒前
灵溪发布了新的文献求助30
31秒前
32秒前
34秒前
34秒前
Ava应助Rubisco采纳,获得10
34秒前
帅气之槐发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
星辰大海应助ShengzhangLiu采纳,获得10
36秒前
36秒前
40秒前
彩色一手发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
脑洞疼应助宝拉~采纳,获得10
42秒前
端庄煎饼应助小白采纳,获得10
43秒前
44秒前
45秒前
彩色一手完成签到,获得积分20
49秒前
49秒前
惠炳发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
50秒前
阳离子完成签到,获得积分10
52秒前
高分求助中
进口的时尚——14世纪东方丝绸与意大利艺术 Imported Fashion:Oriental Silks and Italian Arts in the 14th Century 800
Autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise: linear versus a velocity-based flexible model 550
临床微生物检验问与答 (第二版), 人民卫生出版社, 2014:146 500
Green building development for a sustainable environment with artificial intelligence technology 500
Zeitschrift für Orient-Archäologie 500
The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Rights, Representation, and Reform: Nonsense upon Stilts and Other Writings on the French Revolution 320
Med Surg Certification Review Book: 3 Practice Tests and CMSRN Study Guide for the Medical Surgical (RN-BC) Exam [5th Edition] 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3350975
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2976530
关于积分的说明 8675444
捐赠科研通 2657683
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1455204
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 673739
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 664242