The effectiveness of interventions in reducing pain related to orthodontic separation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 梅德林 随机对照试验 置信区间 科克伦图书馆 系统回顾 相对风险 物理疗法 牙科 外科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Lama Mohammad Saffouh Al-Hanbali,Ahmad S Burhan,Mohammad Y Hajeer,Kinda Sultan,Fehmieh R Nawaya
出处
期刊:European Journal of Orthodontics [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:46 (1) 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjad078
摘要

Abstract Background Pain is an unpleasant experience and annoying sensation. To control this pain during orthodontic separation, different pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods have been used. Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to critically assess the evidence of the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods in reducing pain induced by orthodontic separation. Search strategy An electronic search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed® (Medline), Scopus®, EMBASE®, Web of ScienceTM, Google ScholarTM, ProQuest, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials (CENTRAL) searching for the studies published between January 2012 and April 2023. Selection criteria Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, each experimental group included patients who received elastomeric separators and one kind of pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for pain reduction during the separation stage. Data collection and analysis Cochrane’s risk of bias tool (RoB2 tool) was applied. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE] approach was used to evaluate the strength of the evidence. Results Thirty-one studies (RCTs) were included in this systematic review. Nineteen of them were appropriate for quantitative synthesis and used VAS for pain assessment. Meta-analysis showed that low-level laser therapy (LLLT) was an effective approach for pain relief after separators placement with standard mean difference of 13.79 mm (95% confidence interval (CI): −15.64, −11.94) at 6 h and 23.34 mm at 24 h (95% CI: −25.91, −20.77). LLLT was also effective when applied in split-mouth and the standard mean difference was 8.9 mm at 6 h (95% CI: −12.86, −3.33) and 17.15 mm at 24 h (95% CI: −30.12, −4.17). Ibuprofen had a pain control effect at 6 h and at 24 h compared with the placebo group. The standard mean difference was 14.37 mm (95% CI: −20.54, −8.19) and 20.46 mm (95% CI: −27.79, −13.13), respectively. There was no difference in pain control between ibuprofen and acetaminophen. Naproxen had lower visual analog scale scores in pain perception at 6 h and the standard mean difference was 7.03 mm (95% CI: −12.67, −1.40). Conclusions The application of LLLT decreased the pain induced by the separation during the first day of teeth separation; the pain reduction showed an increase from 6 h to the end of the 24 h. However, the evidence is weak to moderate. The analgesics reduced the pain compared to placebo; this pain reduction had shown an increase from 6 h to the end of the 24 h. The strength of the evidence is moderate. Naproxen gel effectively reduced the pain compared to placebo; the evidence in this regard is moderate. Naproxen gel effectively reduced the pain compared to placebo, but it was less effective than the oral intake of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, the evidence in this regard is moderate. Registration This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022335553) during the first stages of its conduction.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
搜集达人应助感动又晴采纳,获得10
刚刚
清脆惜寒应助倚歌采纳,获得10
1秒前
june发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
芬芬发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
韧战发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
脑洞疼应助亓大大采纳,获得10
4秒前
大个应助snnnn采纳,获得10
5秒前
灰烬使者完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
八格牙路完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
、、、发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
岩追研发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
跃May发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
fanny发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
奋斗小蜜蜂完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
hqy完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
领导范儿应助charm12采纳,获得10
11秒前
感动又晴完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
苦难诗社发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
yatou5651发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
许子健发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
nini发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
开朗的山彤应助张阿童木采纳,获得10
14秒前
追寻依风发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
隐形曼青应助雾昂采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
betsy发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
wuhuhu关注了科研通微信公众号
16秒前
eAN完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
The Pedagogical Leadership in the Early Years (PLEY) Quality Rating Scale 410
Why America Can't Retrench (And How it Might) 400
Stackable Smart Footwear Rack Using Infrared Sensor 300
Modern Britain, 1750 to the Present (第2版) 300
Writing to the Rhythm of Labor Cultural Politics of the Chinese Revolution, 1942–1976 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4603996
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4012488
关于积分的说明 12423933
捐赠科研通 3693069
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2036050
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1069178
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 953646