Comparative Effectiveness of Pharmacologic Treatments for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine Headache: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis for the American College of Physicians

医学 偏头痛 荟萃分析 替代医学 比较有效性研究 系统回顾 梅德林 重症监护医学 家庭医学 物理疗法 精神科 内科学 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Johanna AAG Damen,Bada Yang,Demy L. Idema,Robin W.M. Vernooij,Linde F. Huis in ‘t Veld,Mike P.T. Kusters,René Spijker,Kim van der Braak,Pauline Heus,Kevin Jenniskens,Lotty Hooft
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.7326/annals-24-00315
摘要

Various treatments for preventing episodic migraine are available. To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and harms of pharmacologic prevention of episodic migraine, focusing on treatments already determined to be superior to placebo. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until April 2024. Randomized trials evaluating selected efficacious pharmacologic treatments in adults with episodic migraine. Selection was done independently by 2 reviewers. Data were extracted by 1 reviewer and checked by a second. Risk of bias and certainty of the evidence were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach, respectively. Sixty-one studies (20 680 patients) evaluating 16 treatments were included. Nineteen studies had low risk of bias. All selected treatments were deemed efficacious against placebo on the basis of previous systematic reviews. In network meta-analyses, calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist monoclonal antibodies (CGRP-mAbs) probably resulted in fewer discontinuations due to adverse events than topiramate (risk difference, -16.2% [95% CI, -18.4% to -12.8%]; moderate-certainty evidence), and CGRP-mAbs may result in less migraine-related disability and improved quality of life compared with gepants (mean differences, -4.12 [CI, -9.30 to 1.05] and 2.25 [CI, -0.85 to 5.34], respectively; low-certainty evidence). For other outcomes and comparisons, there was moderate- or low-certainty evidence of no clinically important differences, uncertain evidence, or no evidence. Limited literature was available to determine the minimal important differences. The number of head-to-head comparisons of treatments was limited. No high-certainty evidence favored one pharmacologic treatment for prevention of episodic migraine over another. Evidence was mostly insufficient or of low certainty. American College of Physicians. (PROSPERO: CRD42023414305).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Stella完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
老鼠耗子发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
飞奔的鱼发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Akim应助KID采纳,获得30
2秒前
3秒前
songvv发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
CodeCraft应助Jammie采纳,获得10
3秒前
kyokukou发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
积极向上完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
米娅发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
喜悦青亦发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
leave完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
sumuuchen发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
学习猴发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
小帅发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
酷炫书芹完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
xin33完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Hyunjinnn发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
研人员完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助fish采纳,获得10
7秒前
yuhaha发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
田様应助Treasure98采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
一麻袋开心完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
fangyc发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
脑洞疼应助paacbe采纳,获得10
8秒前
xiubo128完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
zychaos发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2500
Continuum thermodynamics and material modelling 2000
Healthcare Finance: Modern Financial Analysis for Accelerating Biomedical Innovation 2000
Applications of Emerging Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology 1111
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 1000
지식생태학: 생태학, 죽은 지식을 깨우다 700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 纳米技术 内科学 物理 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3469573
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3062778
关于积分的说明 9080006
捐赠科研通 2752931
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1510668
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 697958
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 697938