Randomized controlled trial of intravesical electrical stimulation for underactive bladder

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravesical electrical stimulation (IVES) performed with a novel device in patients with underactive bladder (UAB).This was a multicentre, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial of patients with UAB in China. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive conventional IVES (n = 38) or IVES with an open circuit (n = 38). The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline in post-void residual urine volume (PVR) after 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary efficacy measures included changes in maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax ), bladder voiding efficiency (BVE), number of 24-h clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) procedures, and Patient Perception of Bladder Condition-Scale (PPBC-S) and American Urological Association Symptom Index Quality of Life (AUA-SI-QoL) scores from baseline after 4 weeks of treatment. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the trial.In the full analysis set (FAS), the mean (sd) PVR changes in the trial and control groups at 4 weeks were -97.1 (107.5) mL and -10.5 (86.7) mL, respectively (P < 0.01). Similar results were obtained in the per-protocol set (PPS): -102.9 (100.0) mL vs 0.7 (82.5) mL (P < 0.01). In the FAS and PPS, Qmax improved significantly at 4 weeks (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03). In the FAS and PPS, BVE was significantly improved at 4 weeks in the two groups (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01), whereas no significant differences in the number of 24-h CIC procedures, PPBC-S score or AUA-SI-QoL score were observed between the groups. Six possible therapy-related AEs occurred in six patients (four in the trial group and two in the control group; P = 0.67), all of which were urinary tract infections. No severe AEs were reported.The results of this clinical study strongly demonstrate that UAB patients benefit from this novel IVES device. More research is needed to validate the clinical utility of this device.