A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing Ceftobiprole Medocaril with Vancomycin plus Ceftazidime for the Treatment of Patients with Complicated Skin and Skin-Structure Infections

医学 内科学 头孢他啶 万古霉素 蜂窝织炎 人口 随机对照试验 外科 临床试验 金黄色葡萄球菌 铜绿假单胞菌 遗传学 环境卫生 细菌 生物
作者
Gary J. Noel,Karen Bush,Partha Bagchi,Juliana Ianus,Richard Strauß
出处
期刊:Clinical Infectious Diseases [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:46 (5): 647-655 被引量:253
标识
DOI:10.1086/526527
摘要

Background. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial involving patients with a broad range of complicated skin and skin-structure infections due to either gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria was conducted to compare ceftobiprole monotherapy with treatment with vancomycin plus ceftazidime. Methods. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive ceftobiprole or to receive vancomycin plus ceftazidime. Outcomes were determined at a test-of-cure visit (7–14 days after completion of therapy) and were analyzed for all patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections, as well as for subgroups, on the basis of major types of infections and severity of disease. Results. Among the clinically evaluable and the intent-to-treat populations, clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were similar in the ceftobiprole and comparator treatment arms (clinical cure rate, 90.5% [439 of 485 patients] and 90.2% [220 of 244 patients] in the clinically evaluable population, respectively; 81.9% [448 of 547 patients] and 80.8% [227 of 281 patients] in the intent-to-treat population, respectively). Clinical cure rates in ceftobiprole-treated patients ranged from 86.2% (125 of 145 patients) among those with diabetes who had foot infections to 93.0% (80 of 86 patients) among those with cellulitis. Among patients treated with ceftobiprole, clinical cure rates were similar among patients from whom gram-negative bacteria were isolated (87.9% [109 of 124 patients]) and among patients from whom gram-positive bacteria were isolated (91.8% [292 of 318 patients]) and were not statistically different from the clinical cure rates among comparator-treated patients (89.7% [61 of 68 patients] and 90.3% [149 of 165 patients], respectively). Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events in the 2 treatment groups were similar. Conclusions. Ceftobiprole monotherapy is as effective as vancomycin plus ceftazidime for treating patients with a broad range of complicated skin and skin-structure infections and infections due to gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
跟我回江南完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
蜜意发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
共享精神应助温茶采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
DCdc555发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
esder完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
zhan发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
w__k完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
朱家晓完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
Aron完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
冷艳的璎完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
柚子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
ycy关闭了ycy文献求助
8秒前
木南应助二狗子采纳,获得10
9秒前
wuhao完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Jane发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
11秒前
527020100发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
lijingqi发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
忧郁雅寒完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
任天野应助小侯采纳,获得10
15秒前
hhxy完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
情怀应助蜜意采纳,获得10
15秒前
NexusExplorer应助meiwei采纳,获得10
15秒前
青山发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
ryy完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6018778
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7609483
关于积分的说明 16160244
捐赠科研通 5166562
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2765340
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1746976
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1635419