A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing Ceftobiprole Medocaril with Vancomycin plus Ceftazidime for the Treatment of Patients with Complicated Skin and Skin-Structure Infections

医学 内科学 头孢他啶 万古霉素 蜂窝织炎 人口 随机对照试验 外科 临床试验 金黄色葡萄球菌 铜绿假单胞菌 遗传学 环境卫生 细菌 生物
作者
Gary J. Noel,Karen Bush,Partha Bagchi,Juliana Ianus,Richard Strauß
出处
期刊:Clinical Infectious Diseases [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:46 (5): 647-655 被引量:253
标识
DOI:10.1086/526527
摘要

Background. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial involving patients with a broad range of complicated skin and skin-structure infections due to either gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria was conducted to compare ceftobiprole monotherapy with treatment with vancomycin plus ceftazidime. Methods. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive ceftobiprole or to receive vancomycin plus ceftazidime. Outcomes were determined at a test-of-cure visit (7–14 days after completion of therapy) and were analyzed for all patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections, as well as for subgroups, on the basis of major types of infections and severity of disease. Results. Among the clinically evaluable and the intent-to-treat populations, clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were similar in the ceftobiprole and comparator treatment arms (clinical cure rate, 90.5% [439 of 485 patients] and 90.2% [220 of 244 patients] in the clinically evaluable population, respectively; 81.9% [448 of 547 patients] and 80.8% [227 of 281 patients] in the intent-to-treat population, respectively). Clinical cure rates in ceftobiprole-treated patients ranged from 86.2% (125 of 145 patients) among those with diabetes who had foot infections to 93.0% (80 of 86 patients) among those with cellulitis. Among patients treated with ceftobiprole, clinical cure rates were similar among patients from whom gram-negative bacteria were isolated (87.9% [109 of 124 patients]) and among patients from whom gram-positive bacteria were isolated (91.8% [292 of 318 patients]) and were not statistically different from the clinical cure rates among comparator-treated patients (89.7% [61 of 68 patients] and 90.3% [149 of 165 patients], respectively). Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events in the 2 treatment groups were similar. Conclusions. Ceftobiprole monotherapy is as effective as vancomycin plus ceftazidime for treating patients with a broad range of complicated skin and skin-structure infections and infections due to gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
执业匪徒发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
3秒前
4秒前
星辰关注了科研通微信公众号
4秒前
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助wzzznh采纳,获得10
7秒前
边港洋发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
zjjjjj完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
Jiayou Zhang完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
长情的语风完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
小小发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
边港洋完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
冷酷太清完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Jasper应助健康的幻珊采纳,获得10
19秒前
original完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
万能图书馆应助啦啦啦采纳,获得10
19秒前
178发布了新的文献求助30
20秒前
ii应助文件撤销了驳回
21秒前
zhaoxi完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
czm发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
23秒前
daixan89发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
Rookie完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
hh完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
27秒前
roe完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
鱼鱼完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
five发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
30秒前
老徐完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
领导范儿应助杨廷友采纳,获得10
31秒前
ojhhosh发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 生物化学 化学工程 物理 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6023090
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7646777
关于积分的说明 16171357
捐赠科研通 5171450
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2767125
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1750492
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1637045