Effect of renal denervation on blood pressure in the presence of antihypertensive drugs: 6-month efficacy and safety results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED proof-of-concept randomised trial

医学 血压 动态血压 抗高血压药 不利影响 去神经支配 人口 临床终点 回廊的 内科学 外科 随机对照试验 临床试验 麻醉 心脏病学 环境卫生
作者
David E. Kandzari,Michael Böhm,Felix Mahfoud,Raymond R. Townsend,Michael A. Weber,Stuart J. Pocock,Konstantinos Tsioufis,Dimitrios Tousoulis,James W. Choi,Cara East,Sandeep Brar,Sidney A. Cohen,Martin Fahy,Garrett Pilcher,Kazuomi Kario,Jiro Aoki,Bryan Batson,Debbie L. Cohen,George Dangas,Shukri David,Justin E. Davies,Chandan Devireddy,David E. Kandzari,David P. Lee,Philipp Lurz,Vasilios Papademetriou,Manesh R. Patel,Kiritkumar Patel,Roland E. Schmieder,Andrew Sharp,Jasvindar Singh,Antony Walton,Thomas Weber,Joachim Weil,Thomas Zeller,Khaled M. Ziada,Kengo Tanabe,Robert B. Wilkins,Robert L. Wilensky,Johanna Contreras,Susan Steigerwalt,Neil Chapman,Janice P. Lea,Denise Reedus,Satoshi Hoshide,Adrian Ma,Karl Fengler,Ping Li,Laura P. Svetkey,Anjani Rao,Axel Schmid,Anthony Watkinson,Angela Brown,Ingrid Hopper,Markus Suppan,Tolga Agdirlioglu,Elias Noory,Craig Chasen
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:391 (10137): 2346-2355 被引量:496
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30951-6
摘要

Background Previous catheter-based renal denervation studies have reported variable efficacy results. We aimed to evaluate safety and blood pressure response after renal denervation or sham control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension on antihypertensive medications with drug adherence testing. Methods In this international, randomised, single-blind, sham-control, proof-of-concept trial, patients with uncontrolled hypertension (aged 20–80 years) were enrolled at 25 centres in the USA, Germany, Japan, UK, Australia, Austria, and Greece. Eligible patients had an office systolic blood pressure of between 150 mm Hg and 180 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher; a 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure of between 140 mm Hg and 170 mm Hg at second screening; and were on one to three antihypertensive drugs with stable doses for at least 6 weeks. Patients underwent renal angiography and were randomly assigned to undergo renal denervation or sham control. Patients, caregivers, and those assessing blood pressure were masked to randomisation assignments. The primary efficacy endpoint was blood pressure change from baseline (measured at screening visit two), based on ambulatory blood pressure measurements assessed at 6 months, as compared between treatment groups. Drug surveillance was used to assess medication adherence. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety events were assessed through 6 months as per major adverse events. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02439775, and follow-up is ongoing. Findings Between July 22, 2015, and June 14, 2017, 467 patients were screened and enrolled. This analysis presents results for the first 80 patients randomly assigned to renal denervation (n=38) and sham control (n=42). Office and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure decreased significantly from baseline to 6 months in the renal denervation group (mean baseline-adjusted treatment differences in 24 h systolic blood pressure −7·0 mm Hg, 95% CI −12·0 to −2·1; p=0·0059, 24 h diastolic blood pressure −4·3 mm Hg, −7·8 to −0·8; p=0.0174, office systolic blood pressure −6·6 mm Hg, −12·4 to −0·9; p=0·0250, and office diastolic blood pressure −4·2 mm Hg, −7·7 to −0·7; p=0·0190). The change in blood pressure was significantly greater at 6 months in the renal denervation group than the sham-control group for office systolic blood pressure (difference −6·8 mm Hg, 95% CI −12·5 to −1·1; p=0·0205), 24 h systolic blood pressure (difference −7·4 mm Hg, −12·5 to −2·3; p=0·0051), office diastolic blood pressure (difference −3·5 mm Hg, −7·0 to −0·0; p=0·0478), and 24 h diastolic blood pressure (difference −4·1 mm Hg, −7·8 to −0·4; p=0·0292). Evaluation of hourly changes in 24 h systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure showed blood pressure reduction throughout 24 h for the renal denervation group. 3 month blood pressure reductions were not significantly different between groups. Medication adherence was about 60% and varied for individual patients throughout the study. No major adverse events were recorded in either group. Interpretation Renal denervation in the main renal arteries and branches significantly reduced blood pressure compared with sham control with no major safety events. Incomplete medication adherence was common. Funding Medtronic. Previous catheter-based renal denervation studies have reported variable efficacy results. We aimed to evaluate safety and blood pressure response after renal denervation or sham control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension on antihypertensive medications with drug adherence testing. In this international, randomised, single-blind, sham-control, proof-of-concept trial, patients with uncontrolled hypertension (aged 20–80 years) were enrolled at 25 centres in the USA, Germany, Japan, UK, Australia, Austria, and Greece. Eligible patients had an office systolic blood pressure of between 150 mm Hg and 180 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher; a 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure of between 140 mm Hg and 170 mm Hg at second screening; and were on one to three antihypertensive drugs with stable doses for at least 6 weeks. Patients underwent renal angiography and were randomly assigned to undergo renal denervation or sham control. Patients, caregivers, and those assessing blood pressure were masked to randomisation assignments. The primary efficacy endpoint was blood pressure change from baseline (measured at screening visit two), based on ambulatory blood pressure measurements assessed at 6 months, as compared between treatment groups. Drug surveillance was used to assess medication adherence. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety events were assessed through 6 months as per major adverse events. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02439775, and follow-up is ongoing. Between July 22, 2015, and June 14, 2017, 467 patients were screened and enrolled. This analysis presents results for the first 80 patients randomly assigned to renal denervation (n=38) and sham control (n=42). Office and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure decreased significantly from baseline to 6 months in the renal denervation group (mean baseline-adjusted treatment differences in 24 h systolic blood pressure −7·0 mm Hg, 95% CI −12·0 to −2·1; p=0·0059, 24 h diastolic blood pressure −4·3 mm Hg, −7·8 to −0·8; p=0.0174, office systolic blood pressure −6·6 mm Hg, −12·4 to −0·9; p=0·0250, and office diastolic blood pressure −4·2 mm Hg, −7·7 to −0·7; p=0·0190). The change in blood pressure was significantly greater at 6 months in the renal denervation group than the sham-control group for office systolic blood pressure (difference −6·8 mm Hg, 95% CI −12·5 to −1·1; p=0·0205), 24 h systolic blood pressure (difference −7·4 mm Hg, −12·5 to −2·3; p=0·0051), office diastolic blood pressure (difference −3·5 mm Hg, −7·0 to −0·0; p=0·0478), and 24 h diastolic blood pressure (difference −4·1 mm Hg, −7·8 to −0·4; p=0·0292). Evaluation of hourly changes in 24 h systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure showed blood pressure reduction throughout 24 h for the renal denervation group. 3 month blood pressure reductions were not significantly different between groups. Medication adherence was about 60% and varied for individual patients throughout the study. No major adverse events were recorded in either group. Renal denervation in the main renal arteries and branches significantly reduced blood pressure compared with sham control with no major safety events. Incomplete medication adherence was common.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
huaming完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
阿达发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
FashionBoy应助欠虐宝宝采纳,获得10
7秒前
yjr完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
共享精神应助JIANG采纳,获得10
7秒前
BEYOND啊发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
汇价霸完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
18秒前
jason0023发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
复杂的宛完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
斯寜应助瓦猫采纳,获得20
22秒前
英俊的铭应助瓦猫采纳,获得10
22秒前
22秒前
木头人456完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
欠虐宝宝发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
复杂的宛发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
taotao发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
25秒前
adai完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
kkkk完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
不知道叫个啥完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
27秒前
27秒前
LAL百分组合完成签到,获得积分0
29秒前
YIFGU完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
bommi发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
31秒前
32秒前
瓦猫完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
温柔小狮发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
serenity完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
清茶旧友完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
左悬月发布了新的文献求助200
37秒前
bommi完成签到,获得积分20
38秒前
BIGDUCK完成签到,获得积分20
39秒前
欠虐宝宝完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
高分求助中
All the Birds of the World 4000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Machine Learning Methods in Geoscience 1000
Resilience of a Nation: A History of the Military in Rwanda 888
Musculoskeletal Pain - Market Insight, Epidemiology And Market Forecast - 2034 666
Crystal Nonlinear Optics: with SNLO examples (Second Edition) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3734558
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3278480
关于积分的说明 10009777
捐赠科研通 2995112
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1643222
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 781009
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 749196