亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of tiotropium bromide (5 μg) inhaled via Respimat in Chinese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

噻托溴铵 医学 安慰剂 恶化 肺活量 慢性阻塞性肺病 异丙托溴铵 麻醉 内科学 支气管扩张剂 肺功能 哮喘 扩散能力 病理 替代医学
作者
Yan Tang,Dan Massey,Nanshan Zhong
出处
期刊:Chinese Medical Journal [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:126 (19): 3603-3607 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20130415
摘要

Background A pharmacokinetic study in an Asian population showed that tiotropium 5 μg via Respimat leads to the same plasma levels compared to 18 μg via HandiHaler. The objective of the trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment (1 year) with tiotropium bromide (5 μg) via Respimat ® with placebo in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods A total of 3991 patients were randomized in this double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study, while in China 338 patients (309 males, 29 females) received either tiotropium bromide ( n =167) or placebo ( n =171). Tiotropium bromide solution or matching placebo was delivered via Respimat ® at a dosage of 5 μg (2 × 2.5 μg/puff) once daily for 48 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and the time to first exacerbation. Results Statistically significant improvements in trough FEV1 and trough forced vital capacity (FVC) in the tiotropium group were achieved at weeks 4, 24, and 48 compared with those in the placebo group. A statistically significant difference ( P =0.0027) in favour of tiotropium was also observed for the time to first exacerbation. The total numbers of exacerbations during treatment were 90 and 128 in the tiotropium and placebo groups, respectively, with a rate ratio of 0.69 ( P =0.0164). The difference between the treatment groups in the adjusted mean changes from baseline of St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score was −3.9 (95% CI : −7.5, −0.2) and was of statistical significance ( P =0.0367). The incidences of serious adverse events (SAEs) in the tiotropium and placebo groups were 16.2% and 17.0%, respectively. Seven deaths occurred whilst patients were on treatment, four in the tiotropium group and three in the placebo group, all of which were assessed as non-related study drugs by the investigators. Conclusions Tiotropium significantly improved lung function and quality of life, delayed the time to first exacerbation, reduced the number of exacerbations. Overall, tiotropium was well tolerated.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
热情的橙汁完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
25秒前
35秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
54秒前
1分钟前
菠萝完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
小蘑菇应助菠萝采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
头孢西丁发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
KachiRyoji应助容若采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
Sunnpy完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
斯文败类应助容若采纳,获得10
3分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
苏震坤发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
KachiRyoji应助容若采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
jinyue发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
谵妄姿态发布了新的文献求助30
3分钟前
传奇3应助超级灰狼采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
谵妄姿态完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
超级灰狼发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
科研通AI5应助wzhtnl采纳,获得10
4分钟前
后陡门爱神完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
科研通AI6应助容若采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
Perry完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
科研通AI6应助容若采纳,获得10
5分钟前
5分钟前
我刷的烧饼贼亮完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
obedVL完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
丁笑天完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
网络安全 SEMI 标准 ( SEMI E187, SEMI E188 and SEMI E191.) 1000
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
The Pedagogical Leadership in the Early Years (PLEY) Quality Rating Scale 410
Why America Can't Retrench (And How it Might) 400
Two New β-Class Milbemycins from Streptomyces bingchenggensis: Fermentation, Isolation, Structure Elucidation and Biological Properties 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4611441
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4016962
关于积分的说明 12435927
捐赠科研通 3698837
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2039748
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1072548
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 956235