米托蒽醌
医学
氢化可的松
内科学
癌症
化疗
前列腺癌
生活质量(医疗保健)
随机对照试验
肿瘤科
耐火材料(行星科学)
外科
物理
护理部
天体生物学
作者
Philip W. Kantoff,Susan Halabi,Mark R. Conaway,Joel Picus,Jeffrey Kirshner,Vera Hárs,Donald L. Trump,Eric P. Winer,Nicholas J. Vogelzang
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco.1999.17.8.2506
摘要
Approximately 40,000 men die each year of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The results of treatment with chemotherapy have been disappointing to date, with no trials demonstrating a benefit with respect to survival duration. Corticosteroids and mitoxantrone each have been shown to be active agents in this disease. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate an advantage of mitoxantrone and hydrocortisone (M+H) over hydrocortisone alone with respect to survival duration.Two hundred forty-two patients with HRPC were randomized to receive either M+H or hydrocortisone alone. Patients were monitored for survival, time to disease progression, time to treatment failure, response, and quality-of-life (QOL) parameters.Treatment in both arms was well tolerated. Although there was a delay in time to treatment failure and disease progression in favor of M+H over hydrocortisone alone, there was no difference in overall survival (12.3 months for M+H v 12.6 months for hydrocortisone alone). There was an indication that QOL was better with M+H, in particular with respect to pain control.M+H generated more frequent responses and a delay in both time to treatment failure and disease progression compared with hydrocortisone alone. In addition, there was a possible benefit of M+H with respect to pain control over hydrocortisone alone. No improvement in survival was observed. Although M+H could be viewed as a palliative option for patients with HRPC, new drugs and novel strategies are needed to improve survival for this disease.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI