Effectiveness of Tonsillectomy vs Modified Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty in Patients With Tonsillar Hypertrophy and Obstructive Sleep Apnea

医学 悬雍垂腭咽成形术 扁桃体切除术 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停 体质指数 随机对照试验 多导睡眠图 艾普沃思嗜睡量表 睡眠呼吸暂停 队列 外科 呼吸暂停 麻醉 内科学
作者
Joar Sundman,Pia Nerfeldt,Johan Fehrm,Johan Bring,Nanna Browaldh,Danielle Friberg
出处
期刊:JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery [American Medical Association]
卷期号:148 (12): 1173-1173 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3432
摘要

Importance Modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (mUPPP) is a surgical treatment for selected adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Tonsillectomy (TE) alone is a less extensive alternative treatment. Objective To investigate whether mUPPP is more effective than TE alone in treating adult patients with tonsillar hypertrophy and moderate to severe OSA. Design, Setting, and Participants This blinded randomized clinical trial compared the effectiveness of mUPPP with TE alone before surgery and 6 months postsurgery in adults with tonsillar hypertrophy (sizes 2, 3, or 4 according to the Friedman staging) and moderate to severe OSA in a university hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. Participants underwent surgery from January 2016 to February 2021; the last postsurgery follow-up was completed in September 2021. Data analyses were performed from January to September 2022. Interventions mUPPP vs TE alone. Main Outcomes and Measures Between-group differences on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). Results The study cohort comprised 93 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.6 [9.4] years; 80 [86%] men; race/ethnicity were not considered) with a mean (SD) body mass index of 29.0 (2.8), calculated as weight in kg divided by height in m 2 . Of these, 90 participants (97%) completed the protocol (mUPPP, n = 45; TE, n = 45). The mean (SD) AHI score (number of events per hour [events/h]) for the mUPPP group decreased by 43%, from 51.0 (22.6) to 28.0 (20.0) events/h; and for the TE group, 56%, from 56.9 (25.1) to 24.7 (22.6) events/h. The mean between-group difference in AHI score was 9.2 events/h (95% CI, 0.5 to 17.9), with a small effect size (Cohen d = 0.44) in favor of TE. For ESS scores, the between-group difference was also small, only 1.1 (95% CI, –1.3 to 3.4; Cohen d = 0.21). Neither difference was considered to be clinically relevant. Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that mUPPP was not more effective than TE alone in treating patients with tonsillar hypertrophy and moderate to severe OSA. However, there was a small difference in favor of TE. Because TE alone is less extensive, it could be considered as an alternative to mUPPP in this selected group of patients with OSA. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02523248
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
科研通AI5应助认真银耳汤采纳,获得10
1秒前
传奇3应助totoro采纳,获得10
1秒前
1851611453发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
笨考拉完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
兴奋的定帮应助taoliu采纳,获得10
2秒前
兴奋的定帮应助taoliu采纳,获得10
2秒前
情怀应助知无涯者采纳,获得10
2秒前
5秒前
qjd发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
脑洞疼应助Good_小鬼采纳,获得10
5秒前
Jasper应助读文献的刘楠采纳,获得10
6秒前
上官若男应助雪白雍采纳,获得10
6秒前
9秒前
山橘月完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
我是老大应助Sun采纳,获得10
9秒前
Yurole发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
炙热的山河完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
taoliu完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
火星上念梦完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
斯文败类应助HHH采纳,获得30
11秒前
Elaine发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
Yurole完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
SDNUDRUG完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
知无涯者发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
慕青应助聪慧的微笑采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助30
15秒前
15秒前
17秒前
17秒前
mm发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
21秒前
21秒前
高分求助中
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 1000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 310
The Moiseyev Dance Company Tours America: "Wholesome" Comfort during a Cold War 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3979916
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3524030
关于积分的说明 11219577
捐赠科研通 3261464
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1800674
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 879241
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 807226