索引
生物
Illumina染料测序
DNA测序
基因组
计算生物学
全基因组测序
参考基因组
深度测序
遗传学
癌症基因组测序
基因
单核苷酸多态性
基因型
作者
Sol A Jeon,Jong‐Lyul Park,Seung‐Jin Park,Jeong‐Hwan Kim,Sung‐Ho Goh,Ji‐Youn Han,Seon‐Young Kim
出处
期刊:Genes & Genomics
[Springer Nature]
日期:2021-04-17
卷期号:43 (7): 713-724
被引量:50
标识
DOI:10.1007/s13258-021-01096-x
摘要
Illumina next generation sequencing (NGS) systems are the major sequencing platform in worldwide next-generation sequencing market. On the other hand, MGI Tech launched a series of new NGS equipment that promises to deliver high-quality sequencing data faster and at lower prices than Illumina’s sequencing instruments. In this study, we compared the performance of the two platform’s major sequencing instruments—Illumina’s NovaSeq 6000 and MGI’s MGISEQ-2000 and DNBSEQ-T7—to test whether the MGISEQ-2000 and DNBSEQ-T7 sequencing instruments are also suitable for whole genome sequencing. We sequenced two pairs of normal and tumor tissues from Korean lung cancer patients using the three platforms. Then, we called single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion and deletion (indels) for somatic and germline variants to compare the performance among the three platforms. In quality control analysis, all of the three platforms showed high-quality scores and deep coverages. Comparison among the three platforms revealed that MGISEQ-2000 is most concordant with NovaSeq 6000 for germline SNVs and indels, and DNBSEQ-T7 is most concordant with NovaSeq 6000 for somatic SNVs and indels. These results suggest that the performances of the MGISEQ-2000 and DNBSEQ-T7 platforms are comparable to that of the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform and support the potential applicability of the MGISEQ-2000 and DNBSEQ-T7 platforms in actual genome analysis fields.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI